Clown World Chronicles: What Is ‘White Erasure’?

All over the West, destruction reigns. Statues are coming down, cities are being renamed, history is being rewritten. The destruction can seem so mindless, but there’s one thread running through it all. This article discusses that thread: the concept of ‘white erasure’.

White erasure, in short, is the genocide of white people. This occurs in four sequential stages.

The first is the demonisation of white people. This is achieved by preventing people from speaking favourably about white people (by calling it “racist”), while encouraging people to speak disfavourably about white people. Speaking disfavourably about white people involves insinuating that all white people are racist, and that their history is one of evil.

There are many examples of this in today’s world. Most notable is the outrage generated by the expression of innocuous statements such as “It’s Okay To Be White” or “White Lives Matter“. In both cases, the men making these statements were slammed as racists by their national mainstream media, the first even being compared to Christchurch mosque shooter Brenton Tarrant.

The latter case is especially incredible, as the statement about white lives was made days after a racist terror attack in Reading, England, that claimed the lives of three white people. The end point of the demonisation of white people is that anyone claiming that white people have a right to exist is a racist.

The second stage is minimising white influence in the institutions. This occurs in a variety of ways depending on the institution in question. In all cases, however, it begins with a commitment to diversity, where diversity is defined as a minimum of white people.

In the universities, it starts with offering scholarships to non-white people on the basis that they are not white. The usual argument given is that non-white people are poorer than whites, and therefore deserve help more, but this ignores the fact that working-class white people are also poorer than the white average, and there is no help for them.

A similar phenomenon exists in government. It’s now considered extremely important that the government supports diversity, so much so that even the conservative parties are judged on how many non-white members they have. Again, diversity here is not defined as viewpoint or ideological diversity but simply as an absence of white people. A black person who thinks the same way as middle-class whites is better than a working-class white who thinks differently.

The third stage is minimising the proportion of white people in the population. This is achieved in two major ways: mass non-white immigration and the suppression of white birth rates.

Mass non-white immigration inevitably leads to a lower and lower proportion of white people in the local population. The Brazilianisation of formerly white societies causes white people to fall back into gated communities, ceding public spaces. It has also led to the idea, now popular in Europe as well as in the New World, that Western countries are not inherently white ones. They are the common property of the whole world.

The suppression of white birth rates is achieved by the manufacture of an economic environment in which raising a family is all but impossible. In order for it to be possible, the minimum wage has to pay enough that a man can afford shelter and food for a family of at least two children, a wife and himself – on one wage. This seems ridiculous now, as it is a long way from the case today, but it was once standard.

Mass immigration plays a direct role in this, by destroying the negotiating position of the white working classes. The more desperate they are, and the more imported cheap labour they have to compete with, the lower the wage they will be able to negotiate. The lower the wage, the more precarious their condition, and the fewer children they will be able to afford to bring into the world.

The fourth stage is changing the environment to remove any trace of white influence or presence. This is a multifaceted approach, which simply seeks to erase any sign of white people.

This is all over the world today, especially in the frenzied and ongoing efforts to pull down all statues of white men. The logic is that all white men are guilty of the collective historical sins of the white race, and therefore no memorials to them can be left standing. Everything that reminds of white people is to be erased.

The problem is, as Solzhenitsyn put it, that the line between good and evil runs through every human heart. This means that there are no men who are perfectly innocent. Every historical figure is guilty of at least some sins. So sins can be found in any historical figure, as long as there is sufficient will to uncover them. Anyone can be cancelled.

Another major component of this stage is the movement to rename colonial streets, cities or territories. The idea here is that the “real name” of a place is the indigenous one, such that even native speakers of English are obliged to use it when speaking English. The ultimate goal of this is to remove all trace of white people, as if they had never been present.

The most difficult thing to grasp about all this is why white people are doing it to themselves. It isn’t easy to understand why – it seems at least masochistic, if not outright suicidal. This has caused a number of conspiracy theories to arise, including the usual anti-Jewish ones.

The brutal reality is that this is how life is at the end of an empire. The Roman Empire went through it, when the Christian mobs destroyed all the temples and holy places of the Greco-Roman religion. Their gods destroyed, the citizens lost touch with their conceptions of good and evil. A Dark Age, lasting centuries, was the result. It may be the same for us.

History goes in cycles, and the measure of the swing of the Great Pendulum of history to the left is the measure of its swing to the right. The last five hundred years has seen white people assert themselves upon the world with only the scantiest resistance. The next five hundred might see the world assert itself upon white people.

White erasure may end with a Holocaust of white people, or it could end with their gradual replacement, or it could lead to a resurgence of will that strikes a death blow to Clown World. There’s no way to know yet.

*

This article is an excerpt from Clown World Chronicles, a book about the insanity of life in the post-Industrial West. This is being compiled by Vince McLeod for an expected release in the middle of 2020.

*

If you enjoyed reading this essay, you can get a compilation of the Best VJMP Essays and Articles of 2019 from Amazon for Kindle or Amazon for CreateSpace (for international readers), or TradeMe (for Kiwis). A compilation of the Best VJMP Essays and Articles of 2018 and the Best VJMP Essays and Articles of 2017 are also available.

*

If you would like to support our work in other ways, please consider subscribing to our SubscribeStar fund. Even better, buy any one of our books!

5 thoughts on “Clown World Chronicles: What Is ‘White Erasure’?”

  1. “Plz Allah give me strength to not cuss/kill these men and white folks out here today. Plz plz plz.”

    First, Yusrah Khogali, you should not need to ask for Allah’s help in refraining from cursing and killing. You should find such crimes abhorrent, and should have no difficulty in not committing them. Allah’s help is to be sought in finding sufficient courage to fulfill a righteous task, or in withstanding some physical or mental suffering.

    Second, why are you describing some people – presumably non-Muslims – as “white folk”? You know, or should know, that Islam makes no distinction between people on racial grounds. A person’s standing in the community is, or should be, determined only by his conduct. You also know that many Muslims, including most of those in the Balkans and Russia, are “white”.

    1. Muslims didn’t discriminate? So why is it I can ask any Muslim to describe the very complicated hierarchy of which ethnic group is over which? Why does an Afghani say they have a Pakistani ‘in their hand’ because of the ethnic stack? Why did Muslims create and run the slave trade of blacks for all of history? Why is it only Islamic nations still to this day sell black slaves? Why did they neuter them killing many? Why a pan-Arab league rather than a pan-African? You’re on drugs bro if you think Muslims aren’t super racist. Why do they target ‘white sluts’ and call young white children ‘white sluts’?

  2. Why do you think every rabbi refer to western goyim as amaleki? Why does the holocaust memorial plaque at the Hague read “remember what amalek has done to you, never forget” (the full version of the never forget mantra)? Because they think we are Amalekites, the tribe that their messiah comes to genocide. We must be near extinction for him to come. The first big hurdle was returning to Zion, the second and only remaining hurdle is to get us near extinction so the messiah can deal the killing blow.

    There is a reason IsraAID and Open Societies are funding this genocide against whites. And when you look at the rate we are targeted, raped, and murdered by non whites and the fact we are 1.02% of the worlds population (down from 18% in under 50 years) as someone I sub to on YouTube once said if whites were a species of animal they would be critically endangered.

    The problem is our women and children are so indoctrinated we have little to no chance of turning this around now.

  3. You must be off your gourd if you think that every single person in the world is considered amalek. First off amalek isn’t even recognized by most rabbis, many scriptures dictate that amalek was lost to time and that they only survive in spirit.
    I.E. THOSE THAT WOULD WANT TO DESTROY THE JEWS AND THEIR NATION. (Anti semites/anti Zionists).

    Lastly white people don’t make up 1% of the population, if that were true that only be 78 million caucasians. Simply not true a quick Google search says that they’re somewhere around 60-50%

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *