Ambassadors Of Weed

The cannabis referendum in 2020 may have failed (even if non-Chinese voters voted in favour of it), but it was close enough that no-one has really complained about the liberal medicinal cannabis regime that the Sixth Labour Government introduced.

It’s now very, very easy to get hold of a medicinal cannabis prescription. There are now numerous outfits that will give you a prescription after a teleconsultation. Some of these might demand that you go through a multi-stage process of first trying CBD oil, then THC oil, before you can first get a prescription for THC flowers. But it’s not a difficult process.

Despite this ease, cannabis is not fully accepted in New Zealand. Decades of Drug War programming has brainwashed hordes of idiots into thinking that cannabis fries brains, causes violence and sexual assaults, and is a gateway to criminality. The truth about cannabis doesn’t matter. The perceptions are what lead to the opposition.

In almost every case where cannabis has become legal (excepting Thailand and a few other places) it only became so after a long struggle. The masses have been brainwashed for so many decades to see cannabis as something evil that changing mass perception is something that can only happen slowly.

Millions of conversations must be had before widespread acceptance of cannabis can exist. This must consist of millions of people hearing from multiple other people each how cannabis helped them, whether medicinally, recreationally or spiritually. And then millions of slow realisations that the government lied about it.

Not only must cannasceptics hear the arguments for cannabis law reform, they must hear them from people they respect if they are to change their opinions.

Whether people accept it or not, human society is status-based. This is how we have evolved for hundreds of thousands of years: in tribes where the higher your status, the higher your chance of surviving and reproducing. Status-seeking and status-judging are as hard-wired into us as sleeping.

Thus, people are more likely to become accepting of something if they see high-status people engaging in it. Status can be hard to judge, but most people realise that polite, happy, pro-social people are higher status than bitter, angry and resentful people.

This essay is an encouragement to all the new legal cannabis users to consider themselves ambassadors of weed.

Many people will not have met a medicinal cannabis user before. So if you can create a polite, happy, pro-social impression on such people, it will normalise in the public consciousness the idea that cannabis users are good people. Let’s not forget, most people who voted no in the cannabis referendum did so because they hated cannabis users.

Some political ambassadors end up representing civilisation among the savages. If you are a cannabis user, this is essentially what you are, among all the pissheads, screen zombies and painkiller addicts. So don’t forget it! Act like you are surrounded by ferals, because you are. Modern drug culture, with its belief in the harmlessness of alcohol and the absolute harm of everything else, is a mass psychosis.

This essay, then, is an encouragement for those with medicinal cannabis prescriptions to act as if they were early traders with cannibal tribes. Try not to shock the natives of Boozelandia too much. They’re superstitious and poorly educated. Try to act in a friendly and understanding manner.

This especially relates to doctors and other medical staff.

If you get a prescription for e.g. Tilray 10:10 oil, such that you are directed to take 1mg every day from a 40mg bottle, then take 1mg every day. Don’t drink half the bottle on the first day and then start hassling the doctor for refills. Holding to the prescribed dose will convince people that it’s possible to use cannabis responsibly without ending up like Trainspotting.

None of this is to say that anyone should use less cannabis or not enjoy it.

Modern Rockefeller medicine has been slow to realise it, but one of the main psychiatric benefits of cannabis is precisely that it gets you high. Being high is the opposite of being low, and being low for too long (so that you get stuck there) is commonly known as depression. Therefore, cannabis is a cure for depression.

I have personally found that cannabis can stop dead all manner of suicidal and/or homicidal ideation, and this is primarily achieved by making you feel good when you would otherwise have felt bad. This sounds straightforward to most people, but it’s still a shock to those who believe that people need to suffer for various reasons of character building/anti-degeneracy/religion/sadism.

Anyone who implies that cannabis is bad because it makes people happy is the sort of authoritarian who ought to be kept far from any decision-making. So, please, enjoy it to the max. As with so many other things, an intelligent balance is necessary.

If New Zealand is ever to step fully into the 21st Century and legalise cannabis, it will first require acceptance of cannabis users by the herd. This will require ambassadors of weed to create that acceptance through positive interactions.

*

For more of VJM’s ideas, see his work on other platforms!
For even more of VJM’s ideas, buy one of his books!

*

If you enjoyed reading this essay/article, you can get a compilation of the Best VJMP Essays and Articles from 2021 from Amazon as a Kindle ebook or paperback. Compilations of the Best VJMP Essays and Articles of 2020, the Best VJMP Essays and Articles of 2019, the Best VJMP Essays and Articles of 2018 and the Best VJMP Essays and Articles of 2017 are also available.

*

If you would like to support our work in other ways, subscribe to our SubscribeStar fund, or make a donation to our Paypal! Even better, buy any one of our books!

Correlations With Special Voting Yes In The Cannabis Referendum

VariableSpecial voting Yes for Cannabis
Never married0.781
No children0.745
Special voting Yes for euthanasia0.742
Part-time study0.730
Voting Greens 20200.682
Aged 20-240.663
Currently unpartnered0.637
Aged 25-290.625
Neither ownership of house nor house in family trust0.594
Working in arts or recreation services0.581
Working in information media or telecommunications0.575
Receiving income from Student Allowance0.559
Level 3 certificate0.538
Master’s degree0.534
Working as a professional0.520
Personal income $5,000-$10,0000.511
Working in professional, scientific or technical services0.509
Full-time study0.487
Honours degree0.483
Receiving wage or salary0.473
Doctorate0.451
Mean personal income0.451
Following Judaism0.444
Aged 30-340.439
Bachelor’s degree0.439
Unemployed0.426
Voting The Opportunities Party 20200.422
Working in accommodation or food services0.399
Voting Maori Party 20200.391
Enrolled in a Maori electorate0.389
Working in financial or insurance services0.374
Median personal income0.333
Working in administrative or support services0.328
Working in public administration or safety0.327
Personal income $70,000+0.327
Personal income < $5,0000.293
Maori0.271
Voting Vision NZ Party 20200.256
Following Spiritualism or a New Age religion0.247
Receiving income from Sole Parent Support0.238
Voting ALCP 20200.233
Receiving income from Jobseeker Support0.225
Following no religion0.223
Employed full-time0.218
Working as a community or personal services worker0.216
Enrolled in a North Island electorate0.200
Following a Maori religion0.199
Working in education or training0.190
Aged 35-390.184
Enrolled in an urban electorate0.159
Following Buddhism0.141
Receiving income from Supported Living Payment0.120
Following Hinduism0.115
Receiving no source of income0.103
Working in rental, hiring or real estate services0.097
Asian0.093
Following Islam0.091
Percentage of electorate overseas-born0.078
Employed part-time0.063
Voting Sustainable NZ 20200.048
Working as a sales worker0.034
Pacific Islander0.032
Percentage of females in electorate0.029
Working as a clerical or administrative worker0.015
Aged 40-44-0.017
One child-0.026
Percentage of males in electorate-0.029
Six or more children-0.042
Receiving income from interest, dividends, rent, other investments-0.054
Working in transport, postal or warehousing-0.057
Voting Advance NZ 2020-0.061
Object to answering how many children-0.075
Percentage of electorate New Zealand-born-0.078
Voting TEA Party 2020-0.078
Voting Heartland NZ 2020-0.093
Receiving income from self-employment or owning one’s own business-0.096
Working in electricity, gas, water or waste services-0.097
Voting Labour 2020-0.113
Working in healthcare or social assistance-0.127
Voting ONE Party 2020-0.141
Working in mining-0.161
Turnout rate-0.169
Working in wholesale trade-0.173
Own house in family trust-0.176
Working as a manager-0.195
Five children-0.197
European-0.198
Personal income $50,000-$70,000-0.206
Voting New Zealand First 2020-0.207
Personal income $10,000-$20,000-0.213
Working in construction-0.220
Aged 45-49-0.235
Receiving income from ACC or private work insurance-0.256
Voting NZ Outdoors Party 2020-0.257
Percentage of voting age population enrolled-0.258
Working as a machinery operator or driver-0.277
Voting Social Credit 2020-0.303
Working as a labourer-0.307
Mean age-0.308
Level 2 certificate-0.334
Working in retail trade-0.348
Level 6 diploma-0.352
Working in other services-0.371
Median age-0.392
Aged 50-54-0.397
Working in agriculture, forestry or fishing-0.400
Level 4 certificate-0.419
Four children-0.428
Voting ACT 2020-0.430
No NZQA qualifications-0.446
Not in the labour force-0.454
Personal income $20,000-$30,000-0.457
Level 5 diploma-0.458
Level 1 certificate-0.461
Personal income $30,000-$50,000-0.474
Working as a technician or trades worker-0.476
Following Christianity-0.477
Divorced/separated/widowed-0.494
Voting National 2020-0.494
Aged 85+-0.496
Aged 55-59-0.517
Working in manufacturing-0.517
Aged 70-74-0.524
Aged 65-69-0.526
Not studying-0.533
Aged 75-79-0.563
Aged 60-64-0.571
Receiving income from NZ Super or Veteran’s pension-0.571
Aged 80-84-0.583
Own or part own house-0.635
Currently partnered-0.637
Two children-0.639
Three children-0.654
Voting New Conservative 2020-0.660
Married (not separated)-0.696

*

This table is an excerpt from the upcoming 3rd Edition of Understanding New Zealand, by Dan McGlashan and published by VJM Publishing. Understanding New Zealand is the comprehensive guide to the demographics and voting patterns of the New Zealand people.

Correlations With Voting ALCP In 2020

VariableVoting ALCP 2020
Maori0.881
Living in a Maori electorate0.865
Voting Maori Party 20200.807
Receiving income from Sole Parent Support0.770
Receiving income from Jobseeker Support0.766
Following a Maori religion0.718
Receiving income from ACC or private work insurance0.699
Percentage of electorate New Zealand-born0.695
Voting Advance NZ 20200.684
Level 2 certificate0.636
Unemployed0.635
Five children0.620
Working as a labourer0.589
Six or more children0.583
Personal income $10,000-$20,0000.581
Working as a community or personal services worker0.566
No NZQA qualifications0.550
Receiving income from Supported Living Payment0.550
Level 1 certificate0.545
Level 4 certificate0.528
Voting Vision NZ Party 20200.513
Four children0.507
Never married0.482
Full time study0.443
Currently unpartnered0.393
Voting New Zealand First 20200.381
Level 3 certificate0.375
Working as a machinery operator or driver0.370
Level 5 diploma0.365
Working in construction0.364
Working in transport, postal and warehousing0.352
Following Spiritualism or a New Age religion0.347
Personal income $20,000-$30,0000.332
Voting ONE Party 20200.329
Neither ownership of house nor house in family trust0.320
Following no religion0.285
Working in manufacturing0.268
Working in agriculture, forestry or fishing0.257
Working in electricity, gas, water and waste services0.255
Personal income $5,000-$10,0000.249
Special voting Yes for cannabis0.233
Personal income $30,000-$50,0000.229
Working as a technician or trades worker0.206
Working in mining0.201
Mean age0.167
Divorced/separated/widowed0.161
Three children0.154
Median age0.149
Working in administrative and support services0.134
Voting NZ Outdoors Party 20200.134
Employed part-time0.116
Part time study0.106
Percentage of males in electorate0.070
Working in healthcare and social assistance0.040
Working in other services0.033
Receiving income from Student Allowance0.029
Voting Social Credit 20200.022
Working in accommodation or food services0.020
Working in retail trade0.016
Personal income < $5,0000.011
Receiving wage or salary-0.003
Aged 20-24-0.008
Working in public administration or safety-0.016
Voting Heartland NZ 2020-0.025
Not in the labour force-0.032
Working in arts and recreation services-0.038
Living in a North Island electorate-0.039
Pacific Islander-0.052
Receiving no source of income-0.057
Working in education or training-0.064
Percentage of females in electorate-0.071
European-0.080
Aged 25-29-0.089
Working as a sales worker-0.138
Own or part own house-0.186
No children-0.192
Receiving income from NZ Super or Veteran’s pension-0.193
One child-0.202
Voting Greens 2020-0.228
Aged 65-69-0.230
Employed full-time-0.249
Aged 55-59-0.250
Aged 30-34-0.250
Mean personal income-0.255
Aged 70-74-0.261
Voting Labour 2020-0.269
Aged 60-64-0.274
Median personal income-0.275
Aged 75-79-0.301
Special voting Yes for euthanasia-0.312
Voting New Conservative 2020-0.312
Working as a manager-0.313
Voting The Opportunities Party 2020-0.338
Working in wholesale trade-0.338
Aged 80-84-0.338
Receiving income from self-employment or owning one’s own business-0.345
Following Christianity-0.352
Personal income $50,000-$70,000-0.358
Working as a clerical or administrative worker-0.359
Working in information media and telecommunications-0.369
Two children-0.380
Working in rental, hiring and real estate services-0.383
Voting TEA Party 2020-0.383
Living in an urban electorate-0.388
Currently partnered-0.393
Following Judaism-0.395
Aged 85+-0.403
Following Islam-0.405
Voting Sustainable NZ 2020-0.406
Aged 35-39-0.410
Aged 50-54-0.410
Following Hinduism-0.414
Not studying-0.431
Aged 40-44-0.433
Doctorate-0.445
Working in financial or insurance services-0.446
Aged 45-49-0.465
Percentage of voting age population enrolled-0.470
Own house in family trust-0.472
Voting ACT 2020-0.476
Working as a professional-0.478
Working in professional, scientific or technical services-0.490
Personal income $70,000+-0.513
Turnout rate-0.524
Master’s degree-0.529
Asian-0.530
Honours degree-0.550
Level 6 diploma-0.557
Bachelor’s degree-0.564
Following Buddhism-0.566
Receiving income from interest, dividends, rent, other investments-0.580
Voting National 2020-0.597
Married (not separated)-0.606
Percentage of electorate overseas-born-0.695

*

This article is an excerpt from the upcoming 3rd Edition of Understanding New Zealand, by Dan McGlashan and published by VJM Publishing. Understanding New Zealand is the comprehensive guide to the demographics and voting patterns of the New Zealand people.

Does New Zealand Need A Sadhu System?

New Zealand is currently beset with the question of crime and punishment. The country appears torn between two failed approaches to justice: excessive softness and excessive hardness. Swinging back and forth between the two has led to great dissatisfaction with the Justice System and even talk of vigilante group formation.

Our attitude to justice reflects our moral confusion in the face of what has previously been called the Clown World Fork. Our basic morality is torn between two polar opposites: a wretched, pitiful, Christian doctrine of infinite forgiveness, and a sadistic, paranoid, bestial doctrine of utter destruction. Not having rational balance in our moral philosophy, we also don’t have it in our Justice System.

This has led us to a situation where gang member rapists get lighter sentences than people selling food without a licence. Outcomes like this are possible because we no longer have a shared sense of moral philosophy. There is no longer an agreed scale of heinousness, such that different crimes can be readily apportioned a length of punishment.

It’s time for a moral reset.

It’s time to admit that both Christianity and atheism are dead, and that neither are useful as moral philosophies any more. This means that it’s time to start experimenting with new philosophies. It’s obvious that some kind of new balance needs to be struck, between mercy and severity, for actual justice to be done.

In India there exists something that could be described as the sadhu system. In the sadhu system, criminals can repent by living a low-consumption lifestyle with a view to burning off accrued karmic debt, instead of going to prison. It’s a form of public repentance that New Zealand has no equivalent to. Perhaps we could benefit from one?

A New Zealand equivalent of the sadhu system would involve certain criminals, upon pleading guilty to a crime, to agree to forfeit the right to own property for a set period of time. In exchange, their basic food, clothing and shelter needs are met by the state, and they don’t go to prison or to home detention.

The logic is that many crimes, especially ones of property and violence, are ultimately motivated by egotism, and egotism is ultimately caused by a lack of spirituality. In other words, only a non-spiritual person would become so attached to the material world that they thought it was worth committing crimes to advance oneself here.

In the case of some criminals, dilemmas abound. Some are too dangerous to be allowed to roam the street, but at the same time there may be numerous downsides to sending them to prison. It’s apparent that a third approach is necessary.

This article suggests that certain criminals be offered the choice of prison or becoming part of a new, experimental sadhu system based on the Hindu model. This would entail that the criminal forfeit their right to own property or to accumulate wealth for a certain period of time, in exchange for agreeing to live as a spiritual penitent.

Indian sadhus use a lot of cannabis, which is known to be a spiritual sacrament that induces detachment from the material world. New Zealand sadhus could be given as much cannabis as they feel they need in order to develop beyond their innate clinging to the material world.

New Zealand doesn’t have many Hindu temples, so any introduction of a sadhu system might depend on the previous establishment of a national religion that can accommodate penitents. This might involve a new religion for the Age of Aquarius, such as Elementalism or similar. Perhaps funding could be directed to the construction of an Elementalist temple in every New Zealand town.

Elementalist temples in every town would mean that sadhus could travel as wandering ascetics from town to town, staying at the various temples and hanging out smoking cannabis with the Elementalist priests. These priests, trained in true psychology and not mere huckstering, will be able to help heal the souls of the various sadhus.

The advantages of such a system are many. For one, the Elementalist priests would serve as a kind of psychiatric service to the sadhus, helping them understand their place, and the place of humanity, in the grand scheme of creation. They would explain the laws of karma and the possible reasons for a lowly birth in this life.

The inevitable, knee-jerk reaction to this idea on the part of many is to bemoan the low productivity of the sadhus. But productivity and consumption go hand-in-hand. If we’re going to make a genuine effort to prevent the destruction of the Earth’s climate, we need to encourage people to live low-consumption lifestyles whenever possible.

A sadhu system could provide a neat and voluntary alternative path to rehabilitate criminals. We’re tried breaking them into submission and we’ve tried treating them like children – both approaches failed. Let’s try the spiritual approach, wherein we incentivise the criminally-minded to abandon the material world and to work on eliminating karmic debt.

*

If you enjoyed reading this essay/article, you can get a compilation of the Best VJMP Essays and Articles from 2021 from Amazon as a Kindle ebook or paperback. Compilations of the Best VJMP Essays and Articles of 2020, the Best VJMP Essays and Articles of 2019, the Best VJMP Essays and Articles of 2018 and the Best VJMP Essays and Articles of 2017 are also available.

*

If you would like to support our work in other ways, subscribe to our SubscribeStar fund, or make a donation to our Paypal! Even better, buy any one of our books!