How The Mainstream Media Stifles Dissent

Many regular followers of the mainstream media have noticed a pattern: every time any opposition to globohomo stands up, the media immediately rips into them. This is the result of a deliberate propaganda strategy, carried out by the ruling class, to stifle dissent by using the mainstream media as the gatekeepers of which ideas are allowed to be normalised. This essay explains how they do it.

The general rule is that anyone who stands up to represent their people, but without the approval of the owners of the mainstream media, will be smeared by that media as either insane or evil.

Noam Chomsky likes to point out that the mainstream media normalises opinions by limiting the opinions expressed, but allowing vigorous debate within those limitations. They do this by platforming people who have similar opinions, and then exaggerating the import of any differences. The impression created is that the true, reasonable position is between these two apparent poles.

The use of this strategy meant that dissenters could simply be ignored. Anyone outside the narrow window of acceptable opinion never had their voices heard, so their ideas never entered the mainstream consciousness. This strategy worked excellently until the rise of the alternative media, particularly the Internet-based alternative media, which allowed people to share content without corporate or governmental oversight.

Power is control of the minds of the masses. However, before one can gain that control, one must first gain the attention of the masses. The main power of the mainstream media is to gatekeep that attention. Alternative media, such as VJM Publishing, might produce higher-quality content, but we are not yet in a position to broadcast it to the masses. Despite this limitation, we can reach enough of them to force the mainstream media to adapt their strategy.

Their new strategy is simple: everyone who opposes the owners of the mainstream media is labelled insane or evil. Those are the two labels that get placed on every single free thinker, without exception. If they are incompetent, like most people are, they are labelled insane. Only the competent – and therefore, truly dangerous – are labelled evil.

The standard tactic is to find the most influential authority figure who is willing to smear the target as insane or evil, and then to give that figure a platform. An example is given in the image at the top of this article. The Groundswell protests do not have the approval of the globalists who own the media (unlike the Black Lives Matter protests), so the organisers of those get smeared as “crazy”.

The natural reaction of the average credulous pleb is to assume that the Groundswell organisers must actually be crazy, for, if that wasn’t true, an authority such as the leader of Federated Farmers would not have been allowed media space to make the claim. Surely such a bold statement, if false, would have been denounced by some other authority figure. It must therefore be true.

By featuring a cavalcade of authority figures disparaging the target, the media reduces the standing of the target in the mainstream consciousness. This reduces their influence, as people become shy to be associated with the next nutjob or the next Hitler. This makes it hard to get any resistance movement going.

Examples abound.

Sue Grey of the Outdoors Party regularly gets disparaged as insane, and has done ever since she came out in favour of cannabis law reform. Being female, and being associated with cannabis, she’s a prime target for accusations of mental illness. Reddit provides several examples of her being called a “wingnut” and multiple calls for her to be silenced or fined into oblivion.

Paddy Gower tried to smear Stefan Molyneux and Lauren Southern as evil, but he only succeeded in making himself look like a clown. That didn’t stop the rest of the mainstream media from referring to the Canadians as “far-right”. Anyone questioning the foremost addiction of the Western ruling classes – the addiction to cheap labour – is tarred with the Nazi brush.

The mainstream media has brought out the big guns for the ongoing protests by Australian tradesmen in Melbourne and other places – these protesters have been dismissed as both “conspiracy theorists” and “far-right”. The tradesmen are too obviously masculine and based to get dismissed as crackpots, so they get compared to Nazis. It’s an absurd comparison on the face of it, because the tradies are protesting for freedoms and the government is trying to impose authoritarianism. But not too absurd for Clown World.

In short, if a person is feminine or does drugs they’re written off as schizophrenic; if they are masculine or oppose the mass importation of cheap labour they’re written off as Nazis. Insane or evil – that’s how every alternative to the Establishment is smeared by their lackeys in the mainstream media.

The truth is that the dissenters are much less insane or evil than the current ruling class. Not only has the current Western ruling class built an economic system that is destroying the planet, but they’re happy to destroy any of us in order to keep that system running full speed. The mainstream media, and their owners, are more insane and evil than their targets.

If you enjoyed reading this essay/article, you can get a compilation of the Best VJMP Essays and Articles of 2020 from Amazon for Kindle or Amazon for CreateSpace (for international readers), or TradeMe (for Kiwis). A compilation of the Best VJMP Essays and Articles of 2019, the Best VJMP Essays and Articles of 2018 and the Best VJMP Essays and Articles of 2017 are also available.

If you would like to support our work in other ways, please consider subscribing to our SubscribeStar fund. Even better, buy any one of our books!

Sheeple Are The Weapons Of Kings

It’s natural for children to fight. Children fight in all times, all places and all classes. Some children grow up to become obsessed with weapons, and learning how to assert themselves using those. A small minority of children come to realise that they can put a wall of fighters between them and their enemies. This small minority grows up to become the magicians of the realm of silver.

The lower a man’s rank in the great dominance hierarchy that is our society, the more he will use himself as a weapon. Most men fall within the realm of iron, in which whoever can personally kick the most arse is the most highly ranked. But the leaders of men, those who can distinguish themselves above the herd through the demonstration of some merit, soon gain the loyalty of multiple arse-kickers. In doing so, they enter the realm of silver.

The realm of silver is all about directing the men of iron. If the men of iron are the tools, the men of silver are the hand that guides them. Every man of iron eventually realises that kicking arse is far easier than figuring out whose arse needs to be kicked. That latter task requires a great deal of mental energy, and so it’s outsourced to the man of silver.

In order to maintain his position in the realm of silver, the silver magician needs a unifying narrative. This is a story or myth that serves as a rallying call to those under his influence. It is the metaphysical equivalent of a standard. This unifying narrative imposes order upon a mass of people by regimenting their minds in the same direction.

Those who adopt a narrative from above, without thinking about it, become the sheeple. In this context, it doesn’t matter what the narrative is. In any case, the narrative will always act as a call to solidarity on behalf of some group that considers itself under attack. This group, brought to order under the narrative of one or more silver magicians, is the herd (of sheeple).

The sheeple get milked and fleeced by their ruler, and, at the worst of times, they also get butchered.

As mentioned above, the higher a person’s rank in the great dominance hierarchy, the more they will use other people as tools. Those at the top of the system use people who themselves use people. The king will have a personal herd of aristocrats who themselves each control a herd of underlings. This makes the king a mercury magician, above the realm of silver but still subordinate to influence from the realm of gold.

The ruling class, then, use herds of sheeple against each other. The larger and more aggressive the herd, the more political power its master has. Political influence begins when a person can muster a herd. A gangbanger who can bring twenty loyal men together loses to the chieftain who can muster a hundred, who loses in turn to the warlord who can muster half a thousand.

Many of the clearest examples of this can be seen in religious conflict, such as when Hypatia was murdered by a mob of Christians enraged by a shit-stirrer named Peter. Any priest of true standing ought to be able to whip up a mob willing to destroy any blasphemer or heretic the priest points to. It was through wielding such mobs as weapons that the Roman Catholic Church enforced their 1,200-year reign of terror.

Cancel culture, as described in Clown World Chronicles, is just a modern version of this phenomenon. When New Zealand Human Rights Commissioner Paul Hunt used his platform in the mainstream media to encourage baizuos to contact TradeMe and tell them that the ‘It’s Okay To Be White’ t-shirts sold by VJM Publishing were racist, and succeeded in getting them delisted, it was little different to how religious leaders historically silenced wrongthinkers by stoking mobs against them.

The way to make people into sheeple is to control their minds. This can be achieved either quantitatively, through repetition and brainwashing, or qualitatively, through logical and rational argumentation, or both. In practice, the more a herd is organised by quantity the dumber and larger it will be, and the more it is organised by quality the smarter and smaller it will be.

The reason why the Jews have historically held so much power is that they have had a slave army of hundreds of millions of sheeple known as Christians, who believe that Jews have been chosen by God to enlighten the world. The average Christian will defend Jews at all opportunity, will promote Jews ahead of his own kind and will follow directions from a Jew as if it was the Word of God.

The beauty of modern representative techno-democracy is that you can build up a herd by mutual consent. It’s possible to talk to people online until some of them come to look up to you and, if this is done for long enough, you will sooner or later have your own herd. The degree to which this herd will obey you is a function of the degree of solidarity they have with you, but that’s a subject for another essay.

The ugliness of modern representative democracy is that building up a herd mostly comes down to control of the apparatus of propaganda, and that mostly comes down to television control, and that mostly comes down to money. Effectively, the more money you have, the more you can buy loyalty. All it takes is for you to pay a few dozen journalists to tell their sheeple that you are the next big thing, and that’s usually enough to make it so.

The simple way to protect yourself from becoming a sheeple is to ask yourself, every time a media figure tells you something, “Who owns this person?” Almost inevitably, the media figure turns out to be taking a wage from an editor who tells them what they can say, and that editor is themselves taking a wage from an owner who tells them what they can say that their journalists can say.

The more complicated way is to seek out gold magicians and take a narrative from them instead.

If you would like to support our work in other ways, please consider subscribing to our SubscribeStar fund. Even better, buy any one of our books!

How Many Human Rights Is The New Zealand Government Currently Violating?

The human rights of New Zealanders are outlined in the Bill of Rights Act. This legislation describes the ways in which the Government is, in theory, prohibited from causing harm to the New Zealand people. The astonishing and terrifying fact is that a number of these rights are being violated, right now, by the Sixth Labour Government – and only VJM Publishing cares enough to report on it.

In fact, almost all of our civil and democratic rights (i.e. Sections 12-18 of the Bill of Rights Act), plus some others, are being violated at time of writing.

The COVID-19 pandemic is being used as an excuse by the Government to ignore Section 11, which states: “Everyone has the right to refuse to undergo any medical treatment.” The reality for many today is that they must take a coronavirus vaccine or lose their jobs. It’s illegal in New Zealand to coerce someone into giving up a human right on threat of losing their job, but such is the current hysteria around coronavirus that people are doing it anyway.

Section 13 was violated by the Operation Whakahumanu Police harassment campaign, and the ongoing threat of further harassment. Although Kiwis supposedly have “the right to adopt and to hold opinions without interference,” we can still have cops turn up on our doorstep to intimidate us into silence if we hold the wrong opinions. It seems that intimidation doesn’t quite meet the threshold of interference.

In the case of VJM Publishing, all it took was us selling t-shirts that said ‘It’s Okay To Be White’, and the Police came to our offices to interrogate us about our “concerning” opinions. If one authoritarian snitch claims that a particular opinion you hold is shared by the boogeyman of the moment, then suddenly you’re “ideologically adjacent” to that boogeyman and therefore a threat to national security.

Section 14, which deals with freedom of expression, has been violated in numerous ways. Apparently “Everyone has the right to freedom of expression, including the freedom to seek, receive, and impart information and opinions of any kind in any form.” This section has been violated in more ways than just Operation Whakahumanu.

Lauren Southern and Stefan Molyneux’s attempt to speak in Auckland showed that public officials can override the New Zealand public’s freedom to receive information on a whim. Auckland Mayor Phil Goff decreed that the subject matter Southern and Molyneux intended to cover was too hot for the globohomo stronghold that is the Auckland economic zone, and the Canadian duo were duly banned from speaking.

The prohibition on the use of spiritual sacraments violates Section 15, which states that “Every person has the right to manifest that person’s religion or belief in worship, observance, practice, or teaching, either individually or in community with others, and either in public or in private.” This particular right was already being violated when the Human Rights Act was passed, and still is.

It’s illegal to practice the Greco-Roman Mystery religions, because these religions involve the use of spiritual sacraments which are illegal. Psilocybin-containing mushrooms, the basis of e.g. the Eleusinian Mysteries, are considered a Class A drug by the New Zealand “Justice” System. This means that the Police will destroy anyone exercising their right to manifest a Greco-Roman Mystery religion in worship, observance or practice.

A hierophant who shared a psychedelic sacrament in a group setting for the sake of communing with the divine, as our Indo-European ancestors did for thousands of years before the scourge of Abrahamism befell us, could face life imprisonment as a penalty, this being the maximum penalty for “supply of a Class A drug”. Life imprisonment for practicing one’s religion is about as severe a human rights abuse as one can get, yet it’s on our law books right now.

Section 16, then, which states that “Everyone has the right to freedom of peaceful assembly” is violated in several ways. The most egregious recent example is the arrest and imprisonment for Billy Te Kahika and Vinny Eastwood on August 18th (they have still not been released). Apparently the COVID-19 Response Act means that Section 16 of the Human Rights Act goes out the window.

This is not to mention that Section 16 is also violated by the prohibition on gathering to hear Southern and Molyneux and by the prohibition on gathering to practice Greco-Roman Mystery religions. Peaceful assembly means nothing, it seems; if the Establishment considers you a threat, they will smash you.

Section 17 claims that “Everyone has the right to freedom of association” yet, in practice, only favoured groups are allowed that freedom. If you’re the Mongrel Mob, you can associate freely without interference, but if you’re Action Zealandia, you will find yourself getting targeted by the media (which is, in practice, merely the consent manufacturing arm of the Government).

It might seem strange that New Zealanders of European descent don’t have the freedom to associate without getting smeared by the media, when gang members can not only do so but also get positive press coverage. The only real response to this is to shrug and say “We’re in Clown World now.”

The COVID-19 Response Act has also kicked Section 18 in the arse. Section 18 guarantees that “Everyone lawfully in New Zealand has the right to freedom of movement and residence in New Zealand” but coronavirus hysteria has also seen this one get ignored. The Government doesn’t even have to explicitly override this section; they only have to order the Police to ignore it and they know the Police will obey.

Section 18 also means that the ad hoc roadblocks set up in some rural places are human rights violations. New Zealanders have the right to travel on public roads, which means that other New Zealanders do not have the right to arbitrarily block those roads. Chimping out over coronavirus because you watched too much television is not adequate cause to violate other people’s human rights.

Section 19 is violated in several ways today. This section claims that “Everyone has the right to freedom from discrimination on the grounds of discrimination in the Human Rights Act 1993”. But in practice, anyone can discriminate or be discriminated against – all it requires is the political power (or lack of it) to persuade others to consider you a favoured (or unfavoured) group, a process described by Edward Bernays in Propaganda.

Old people get a big fat basic income of at least $370 per week not available to younger people, brown people get scholarships not available to whites (and sometimes preferential medical care), homosexuals get a level of media attention not available to heterosexuals and women and men both have exclusive spaces not available to the other. In theory, discrimination is illegal, but in reality anyone can freely discriminate against anyone else, as long as they have political power.

The only solution to these constant violations is to replace our toothless human rights system with the Sevenfold Conception of Inherent Human Rights, and empower the average citizen to enforce this conception with violence. This would involve the average citizen being taught about the Sevenfold Conception while at school and then, when an adult, given a state-issued semi-automatic rifle and instructions to use it on any politician threatening the rights outlined in that conception.

If you would like to support our work in other ways, please consider subscribing to our SubscribeStar fund. Even better, buy any one of our books!

Why They Let Terrorists In (And Why They Keep Them In)

After the latest terror attack, this time involving a knifeman at an Auckland supermarket, it was discovered that the terrorist, Ahamed Aathill Mohamed Samsudeen, was born overseas and had been given a refugee visa to stay in New Zealand. Efforts had been made to deport him, but the New Zealand Government insisted he stay. Why? This essay explains.

It’s a grievous error to think that the kind of people who make up the Government are motivated to alleviate the suffering of the New Zealand people, or that the democratic selection process is some kind of meritocracy that promotes philosopher-kings. Such errors occur because that’s how people think things ought to be, and they naively conflate what ought to be with what is.

This line of thinking causes great confusion when people consider why Western governments allow mass immigration of people from violent, low-IQ cultures. Considering that certain immigrant groups (Muslims and Africans in particular) commit an enormous amount of violence and sex crimes wherever they go, why do our rulers keep letting them in?

The usual explanations involve economics, particularly references to the GDP growth imperative, or conspiracy theories about Jews. The reality is even more sinister – you could commit to a zero-growth economy, and get rid of all the Jews, and the Western ruling class would still hold the borders open to terrorists.

Explaining why requires accurately understanding the motivations of the people who comprise the government.

The main motivation of the people making up every government in the world is to stay in control. What gets politicians out of bed in the morning is the desire for control and power. They want to be in charge, usually because they are deeply afraid on a spiritual level, and that fear is assuaged by power, as most fears are.

Having terrorists run amok helps the New Zealand Government maintain control in two major ways.

The first way is that it spreads fear. When a person hears of a stabbing frenzy at a supermarket, the logical thought is that more terrorists might be out there, waiting to attack again. The resulting anxiety costs energy, because a heightened state of physiological arousal must be maintained. The Government wants you to waste your energy in this manner, because it keeps you down.

In this sense, Islamic terrorism has simply replaced fear of the Soviet Union, which replaced fear of the Third Reich, which replaced fear of scientific and technological advancement, which replaced fear of the Devil. It’s now The Big Fear, which the powers that be can stoke whenever they like, simply by devoting television time to it. All that was needed was for Muslims to kill and rape enough people, and then the ruling class had another demon to threaten the plebs with.

Our rulers have long observed, from the example set by Europe, that Muslim immigrants murder, rape and destroy everywhere they go. So those rulers deliberately opened our borders to those same immigrants, and moved them into working-class neighbourhoods, as a kind of biological weapon.

The New Lynn Countdown stabbing is just one example of the inevitable friction created – something our ruling class is insulated from, having long ago retreated to their exclusive neighbourhoods, where violent immigrants are not allowed.

The second way is that it wastes money. As George Orwell wrote in Theory and Practice of Oligarchical Collectivism, a people with surplus wealth will inevitably seek to use that wealth to obtain more freedom. Maximising control means minimising freedom, and, therefore, maximising control means minimising wealth. In the world of 1984, wealth was wasted by neverending wars and intrusive regulation and surveillance – just like in our world.

Emil Kirkegaard discovered that there was a strong positive correlation between an immigrant’s net fiscal contribution to their new society and the IQ of their home nation. There was a similarly strong correlation, only negative, between an immigrant’s net contribution and the Muslim percentage of their home nation. Low-IQ and Muslim immigrants cost the societies that receive them a great deal of money – but that’s precisely why the ruling class lets them in.

Low-IQ and Muslim immigrants, like compulsory te reo classes, the War on Drugs and rolling coronavirus lockdowns, suck up all the surplus wealth created by society. This keeps people from enjoying the leisure time that might see them come together and share their dissatisfaction with the government. This shared dissatisfaction is what leads to popular revolution, so if the Government can make the people too poor to express such dissatisfaction, they can secure their position against those they rule.

The supermarket terrorist was followed around-the-clock by a crack unit of Police called the Special Tactics Group, which was why he was taken down in roughly one minute. But these elite law enforcement officers don’t come cheap. There are believed to be at least 30 suspected terrorists being shadowed by the STG. The total cost must run into the tens of millions.

Allowing mass Muslim and African immigration, and allowing the many terrorists among their number to stay in the country until they attack someone, directly increases the fear and poverty of the New Zealand people. In doing so, the New Zealand Government makes us much easier to control. Not only do we become more compliant to directions from authority figures, but we also become more willing to police each other.

Had the Government simply been mistaken about the long-term consequences of allowing mass Muslim and African immigration, they would deport people like Samsudeen as soon as they realised they were terrorists. But they don’t deport them; they keep them around. They would only do this if keeping them around served a deeper purpose. Fear and poverty is that purpose.

The New Zealand Government imports terrorists, and keeps them here, for essentially the same reasons the governments of Europe let so many Muslims and Africans in, and America allowed itself to undergo The Muttening. The more the masses can be set against each other along fracture lines within the wider population, the less energy those masses have left over to direct upwards at the ruling class. Diversity really is strength – but not for us.

If you would like to support our work in other ways, please consider subscribing to our SubscribeStar fund. Even better, buy any one of our books!