Sheeple Are The Weapons Of Kings

It’s natural for children to fight. Children fight in all times, all places and all classes. Some children grow up to become obsessed with weapons, and learning how to assert themselves using those. A small minority of children come to realise that they can put a wall of fighters between them and their enemies. This small minority grows up to become the magicians of the realm of silver.

The lower a man’s rank in the great dominance hierarchy that is our society, the more he will use himself as a weapon. Most men fall within the realm of iron, in which whoever can personally kick the most arse is the most highly ranked. But the leaders of men, those who can distinguish themselves above the herd through the demonstration of some merit, soon gain the loyalty of multiple arse-kickers. In doing so, they enter the realm of silver.

The realm of silver is all about directing the men of iron. If the men of iron are the tools, the men of silver are the hand that guides them. Every man of iron eventually realises that kicking arse is far easier than figuring out whose arse needs to be kicked. That latter task requires a great deal of mental energy, and so it’s outsourced to the man of silver.

In order to maintain his position in the realm of silver, the silver magician needs a unifying narrative. This is a story or myth that serves as a rallying call to those under his influence. It is the metaphysical equivalent of a standard. This unifying narrative imposes order upon a mass of people by regimenting their minds in the same direction.

Those who adopt a narrative from above, without thinking about it, become the sheeple. In this context, it doesn’t matter what the narrative is. In any case, the narrative will always act as a call to solidarity on behalf of some group that considers itself under attack. This group, brought to order under the narrative of one or more silver magicians, is the herd (of sheeple).

The sheeple get milked and fleeced by their ruler, and, at the worst of times, they also get butchered.

As mentioned above, the higher a person’s rank in the great dominance hierarchy, the more they will use other people as tools. Those at the top of the system use people who themselves use people. The king will have a personal herd of aristocrats who themselves each control a herd of underlings. This makes the king a mercury magician, above the realm of silver but still subordinate to influence from the realm of gold.

The ruling class, then, use herds of sheeple against each other. The larger and more aggressive the herd, the more political power its master has. Political influence begins when a person can muster a herd. A gangbanger who can bring twenty loyal men together loses to the chieftain who can muster a hundred, who loses in turn to the warlord who can muster half a thousand.

Many of the clearest examples of this can be seen in religious conflict, such as when Hypatia was murdered by a mob of Christians enraged by a shit-stirrer named Peter. Any priest of true standing ought to be able to whip up a mob willing to destroy any blasphemer or heretic the priest points to. It was through wielding such mobs as weapons that the Roman Catholic Church enforced their 1,200-year reign of terror.

Cancel culture, as described in Clown World Chronicles, is just a modern version of this phenomenon. When New Zealand Human Rights Commissioner Paul Hunt used his platform in the mainstream media to encourage baizuos to contact TradeMe and tell them that the ‘It’s Okay To Be White’ t-shirts sold by VJM Publishing were racist, and succeeded in getting them delisted, it was little different to how religious leaders historically silenced wrongthinkers by stoking mobs against them.

The way to make people into sheeple is to control their minds. This can be achieved either quantitatively, through repetition and brainwashing, or qualitatively, through logical and rational argumentation, or both. In practice, the more a herd is organised by quantity the dumber and larger it will be, and the more it is organised by quality the smarter and smaller it will be.

The reason why the Jews have historically held so much power is that they have had a slave army of hundreds of millions of sheeple known as Christians, who believe that Jews have been chosen by God to enlighten the world. The average Christian will defend Jews at all opportunity, will promote Jews ahead of his own kind and will follow directions from a Jew as if it was the Word of God.

The beauty of modern representative techno-democracy is that you can build up a herd by mutual consent. It’s possible to talk to people online until some of them come to look up to you and, if this is done for long enough, you will sooner or later have your own herd. The degree to which this herd will obey you is a function of the degree of solidarity they have with you, but that’s a subject for another essay.

The ugliness of modern representative democracy is that building up a herd mostly comes down to control of the apparatus of propaganda, and that mostly comes down to television control, and that mostly comes down to money. Effectively, the more money you have, the more you can buy loyalty. All it takes is for you to pay a few dozen journalists to tell their sheeple that you are the next big thing, and that’s usually enough to make it so.

The simple way to protect yourself from becoming a sheeple is to ask yourself, every time a media figure tells you something, “Who owns this person?” Almost inevitably, the media figure turns out to be taking a wage from an editor who tells them what they can say, and that editor is themselves taking a wage from an owner who tells them what they can say that their journalists can say.

The more complicated way is to seek out gold magicians and take a narrative from them instead.

If you enjoyed reading this essay/article, you can get a compilation of the Best VJMP Essays and Articles of 2020 from Amazon for Kindle or Amazon for CreateSpace (for international readers), or TradeMe (for Kiwis). A compilation of the Best VJMP Essays and Articles of 2019, the Best VJMP Essays and Articles of 2018 and the Best VJMP Essays and Articles of 2017 are also available.

If you would like to support our work in other ways, please consider subscribing to our SubscribeStar fund. Even better, buy any one of our books!

How Many Human Rights Is The New Zealand Government Currently Violating?

The human rights of New Zealanders are outlined in the Bill of Rights Act. This legislation describes the ways in which the Government is, in theory, prohibited from causing harm to the New Zealand people. The astonishing and terrifying fact is that a number of these rights are being violated, right now, by the Sixth Labour Government – and only VJM Publishing cares enough to report on it.

In fact, almost all of our civil and democratic rights (i.e. Sections 12-18 of the Bill of Rights Act), plus some others, are being violated at time of writing.

The COVID-19 pandemic is being used as an excuse by the Government to ignore Section 11, which states: “Everyone has the right to refuse to undergo any medical treatment.” The reality for many today is that they must take a coronavirus vaccine or lose their jobs. It’s illegal in New Zealand to coerce someone into giving up a human right on threat of losing their job, but such is the current hysteria around coronavirus that people are doing it anyway.

Section 13 was violated by the Operation Whakahumanu Police harassment campaign, and the ongoing threat of further harassment. Although Kiwis supposedly have “the right to adopt and to hold opinions without interference,” we can still have cops turn up on our doorstep to intimidate us into silence if we hold the wrong opinions. It seems that intimidation doesn’t quite meet the threshold of interference.

In the case of VJM Publishing, all it took was us selling t-shirts that said ‘It’s Okay To Be White’, and the Police came to our offices to interrogate us about our “concerning” opinions. If one authoritarian snitch claims that a particular opinion you hold is shared by the boogeyman of the moment, then suddenly you’re “ideologically adjacent” to that boogeyman and therefore a threat to national security.

Section 14, which deals with freedom of expression, has been violated in numerous ways. Apparently “Everyone has the right to freedom of expression, including the freedom to seek, receive, and impart information and opinions of any kind in any form.” This section has been violated in more ways than just Operation Whakahumanu.

Lauren Southern and Stefan Molyneux’s attempt to speak in Auckland showed that public officials can override the New Zealand public’s freedom to receive information on a whim. Auckland Mayor Phil Goff decreed that the subject matter Southern and Molyneux intended to cover was too hot for the globohomo stronghold that is the Auckland economic zone, and the Canadian duo were duly banned from speaking.

The prohibition on the use of spiritual sacraments violates Section 15, which states that “Every person has the right to manifest that person’s religion or belief in worship, observance, practice, or teaching, either individually or in community with others, and either in public or in private.” This particular right was already being violated when the Human Rights Act was passed, and still is.

It’s illegal to practice the Greco-Roman Mystery religions, because these religions involve the use of spiritual sacraments which are illegal. Psilocybin-containing mushrooms, the basis of e.g. the Eleusinian Mysteries, are considered a Class A drug by the New Zealand “Justice” System. This means that the Police will destroy anyone exercising their right to manifest a Greco-Roman Mystery religion in worship, observance or practice.

A hierophant who shared a psychedelic sacrament in a group setting for the sake of communing with the divine, as our Indo-European ancestors did for thousands of years before the scourge of Abrahamism befell us, could face life imprisonment as a penalty, this being the maximum penalty for “supply of a Class A drug”. Life imprisonment for practicing one’s religion is about as severe a human rights abuse as one can get, yet it’s on our law books right now.

Section 16, then, which states that “Everyone has the right to freedom of peaceful assembly” is violated in several ways. The most egregious recent example is the arrest and imprisonment for Billy Te Kahika and Vinny Eastwood on August 18th (they have still not been released). Apparently the COVID-19 Response Act means that Section 16 of the Human Rights Act goes out the window.

This is not to mention that Section 16 is also violated by the prohibition on gathering to hear Southern and Molyneux and by the prohibition on gathering to practice Greco-Roman Mystery religions. Peaceful assembly means nothing, it seems; if the Establishment considers you a threat, they will smash you.

Section 17 claims that “Everyone has the right to freedom of association” yet, in practice, only favoured groups are allowed that freedom. If you’re the Mongrel Mob, you can associate freely without interference, but if you’re Action Zealandia, you will find yourself getting targeted by the media (which is, in practice, merely the consent manufacturing arm of the Government).

It might seem strange that New Zealanders of European descent don’t have the freedom to associate without getting smeared by the media, when gang members can not only do so but also get positive press coverage. The only real response to this is to shrug and say “We’re in Clown World now.”

The COVID-19 Response Act has also kicked Section 18 in the arse. Section 18 guarantees that “Everyone lawfully in New Zealand has the right to freedom of movement and residence in New Zealand” but coronavirus hysteria has also seen this one get ignored. The Government doesn’t even have to explicitly override this section; they only have to order the Police to ignore it and they know the Police will obey.

Section 18 also means that the ad hoc roadblocks set up in some rural places are human rights violations. New Zealanders have the right to travel on public roads, which means that other New Zealanders do not have the right to arbitrarily block those roads. Chimping out over coronavirus because you watched too much television is not adequate cause to violate other people’s human rights.

Section 19 is violated in several ways today. This section claims that “Everyone has the right to freedom from discrimination on the grounds of discrimination in the Human Rights Act 1993”. But in practice, anyone can discriminate or be discriminated against – all it requires is the political power (or lack of it) to persuade others to consider you a favoured (or unfavoured) group, a process described by Edward Bernays in Propaganda.

Old people get a big fat basic income of at least $370 per week not available to younger people, brown people get scholarships not available to whites (and sometimes preferential medical care), homosexuals get a level of media attention not available to heterosexuals and women and men both have exclusive spaces not available to the other. In theory, discrimination is illegal, but in reality anyone can freely discriminate against anyone else, as long as they have political power.

The only solution to these constant violations is to replace our toothless human rights system with the Sevenfold Conception of Inherent Human Rights, and empower the average citizen to enforce this conception with violence. This would involve the average citizen being taught about the Sevenfold Conception while at school and then, when an adult, given a state-issued semi-automatic rifle and instructions to use it on any politician threatening the rights outlined in that conception.

If you would like to support our work in other ways, please consider subscribing to our SubscribeStar fund. Even better, buy any one of our books!

The Elementalist Conception Of Truth And Falsehood

1. All physical, emotional, mental and spiritual truths exist as vibrations within the Great Fractal.

2. This includes all possible scientific, spiritual and philosophical truths, which all exist as vibrations within the metaphysical realms of the Great Fractal.

3. Speaking the truth is a matter of expressing a vibration that is appropriate for the physical, emotional, mental or spiritual environment that one is in.

4. Speaking falsehood is a matter of expressing a vibration that is inappropriate for the physical, emotional, mental or spiritual environment that one is in.

5. Speaking falsehood is usually motivated by a desire for wealth or status.

6. There are two ways to wage war: force and deception.

7. In cases where force is not appropriate, war must be waged by deception, and falsehoods must be spoken.

8. Waging war by deception does not allow one to escape the Law of Assortative Reincarnation. The speaker of truth will reincarnate in a world full of speakers of truth; the speaker of falsehood will reincarnate in a world full of speakers of falsehood.

9. The speaking of truth is the path of peace; the speaking of falsehood is the path of war.

10. The best reason to speak falsehood is to entertain the gods.

11. Reject the truth, and suffer; suffer, and entertain the gods!

12. Expressing falsehood always leads to an amount of suffering that matches the magnitude of the falsehood. This suffering can be physical, emotional, mental or spiritual.

13. The magnitude of a falsehood is the degree to which the vibration expressed differs from the vibration of the environment, multiplied by the number of people who hear this expression, multiplied by the degree those hearers believe the expression.

14. The most egregious of all falsehoods are those which deny the Four Tenets.

15. The most common egregious falsehood is denial of the First Tenet.

16. Much of the suffering in the world is the result of denial of the First Tenet or the Fourth Tenet.

17. Correctly understanding these tenets is to understand that consciousness, in its natural state, knows everything, and therefore all learning is remembering.

18. The best reason to speak truth is to alleviate ignorance, and thereby to alleviate suffering.

19. Skillfully spoken truth will alleviate ignorance as well as entertain the gods.

20. Speaking falsehoods may or may not be a bad thing, if the suffering prevented outweighs the suffering caused, or if the suffering entertains the gods.

This chapter is an excerpt from Elemental Elementalism, the foundational scripture of the new religion of the Age of Aquarius.

If you would like to support our work in other ways, please consider subscribing to our SubscribeStar fund. Even better, buy any one of our books!

The Metaphysical Microscope

One of the most common arguments the materialist makes is that nothing divine can be proven. If anything divine existed, so the materialist has it, the believer in the spiritual worlds would be able to present it for scrutiny. If the believer cannot summon the divine to stand before us on command, then it can logically be concluded that nothing divine exists.

The materialist usually demands that the believer produce a magic rabbi with a beard and sandals, this being the conception of the divine in the mind of the herd. Failing that, showing Buddha, Zeus, Krishna or Odin would do. Because no divine being can be so produced, the materialist smugly concludes that nothing divine exists.

Realising evidence of the divine is not a matter of someone bringing it forth as if it were evidence in a court trial. It’s a matter of seeing it. The evidence, in reality, is everywhere. The determining factor is the clarity of one’s vision.

If a sceptic should claim that microbes don’t exist on account of that the sceptic had never seen one, a scientist could give him a microscope. “Simply use this tool called a microscope”, the scientist could say, “and the microbial world will reveal itself to you.” A scene like this happens in high school science classes all over the world every day.

This all sounds logical to a modern person. But what if the sceptic was religious, and didn’t want to look down the microscope for fear of demon possession? Or, what if the sceptic suspected, rightly, that looking down the microscope would so vastly expand his narrow conception of reality that his smug, empty confidence would be shattered?

This might sound absurd, but this is directly analogous to the current situation with psychedelics.

It was known, from the first modern psychedelic wave of Humphrey Osmond and Aldous Huxley in the 1950s, that these sacraments revealed the divine. That’s even where the name comes from: ‘psyche’ means soul, and ‘delic’ comes from ‘deloun’, which means to reveal. In other words, psychedelics reveal the presence of the soul – and thereby the spiritual worlds – to those who could not previously see them.

Anyone who denies this point is obliged to either: take a massive dose of a psychedelic sacrament and take a look for themselves, or keep quiet, and let those who have taken a look do the talking. To refuse to take a psychedelic on any grounds – fear of mental illness or otherwise – and then deny what other people have seen, is childish absurdity.

People may choose not to look through the metaphysical microscope, but they don’t get to deny what others have seen.

The use of psychedelic sacraments is a metaphysical microscope that reveals the spiritual worlds to the observer. If a person denies the spiritual worlds, they are hereby invited to take a large dose of a psychedelic sacrament. Enough is now known about psychedelics for any intelligent person to research a safe dose and to source it from a reputable supplier. Even in the most desperate case, it’s possible to identify and consume a pile of magic mushrooms in the wild.

An unwillingness to do this is not proof that no spiritual worlds exist. It’s merely proof that someone is a coward.

It’s possible to take a heavy dose of a psychedelic and still not see any worlds beyond. This is analogous to how a blind person won’t see any microbes even with a microscope. But neither is this proof that no spiritual worlds exist.

Psychedelics, after all, are not even necessary – it’s possible to see spiritual worlds simply through refining one’s consciousness to a high enough frequency. Since most people don’t have enough time for that, most people take psychedelics. But no-one is blinder than he who will not see.

A microscope is a tool for looking deeper inside the physical world; a psychedelic is a tool for looking deeper inside the metaphysical world.

Those who have seen beyond are as convinced of the existence of spiritual worlds as they are of the existence of Planet Earth. If materialists refuse to use a metaphysical microscope to catch up to those of us who have seen beyond, we will just have to move on without them. They can gather and ponder the contradictions of their worldview while the rest of us can exult in knowing the truth.

Those who do not see are normies, but those who will not see are tards.

If you would like to support our work in other ways, please consider subscribing to our SubscribeStar fund. Even better, buy any one of our books!