Why Kiwis Hate The Police III

After decades of waging the War on Drugs against us, the reputation of the New Zealand Police in the eyes of the New Zealand people was already low, but this month it took a crash dive into depths never before plumbed. The actions of the New Zealand Police this month showed clearly that they are the enemies of the New Zealand people, willing to follow any order to harm Kiwis in the service of the authorities.

The first disgrace was when the Police flew a helicopter over a property in Coromandel to spray poison on a dying cancer sufferer’s medicinal cannabis plants. The unnamed cancer sufferer had been given pharmaceuticals for their suffering, but found them ineffective in comparison to cannabis, so began growing cannabis to produce a medicine that would help them overcome the cancer pain.

It’s hard to imagine a lower dog act than to destroy a sick person’s medicine. Only the most wretched of authoritarians would think that was justifiable. But the New Zealand Police will happily follow orders to destroy the medicine of other Kiwis. All they require is for an authority figure to say that the medicine is actually a dangerous drug, and they go on the attack.

The second disgrace was their use of violence against peaceful protesters on the Wellington Parliamentary lawn during the ongoing anti-mandate protests. At one point, officers went in and dragged a woman out by her hair. At another point, a Maori youth got his head squeezed by a full weight press from another officer. While not necessarily disgraceful by the standards of Anglo countries, it certainly was by the standards of anyone who expects a K-selected quality of policing.

As this video shows, New Zealand Police officers feel no shame at what they do. This is partly because police officers in all countries deal with the scum of society, and sometimes inadvertently generalise those experiences to the population at large. But it’s also at least partly because some of those officers are malicious and sadistic inside their own hearts, and enjoy the opportunities their job gives them to abuse people and get away with it.

The officer in the above video is representative of the New Zealand Police. Most New Zealand Police officers have similar sentiments towards the New Zealand public, as proven by the fact that no officer is willing to speak out against the abuses they commit. Like the staff of concentration camps, New Zealand Police officers just go along with the crimes committed by their fellows.

The New Zealand Police have demonstrated that they’re willing to cause any amount of suffering to Kiwis if they are given the order to do so. They have no concept of “fellow citizens”. There is no solidarity towards us, the New Zealand people, on behalf of the New Zealand Police. The New Zealand people are, as the officer put it in the clip linked above, The Great Unwashed.

If they were given orders to mow us down like dogs, Tiananmen Square-style, they would obey those orders.

Ultimately, however, it’s not their fault. As the Police say themselves, “the job is fucked.” It need not be, but it is. The Police should be taking orders from wise and benevolent leaders, but such people are not in power. Those in power are globalist authoritarians like World Economic Forum lackeys Jacinda Ardern, Justin Trudeau and Emmanuel Macron. These authoritarians are at war with their people – at war with us – and the Police are just tools at their disposal.

The Police, deep down, know that their actions place them in the same moral category as the criminals they claim to be protecting us from. So we must help them heal. The strategy must be to win in the same way Gandhi defeated the British – through good vibes and good cheer. The Camp Freedom protesters on the Parliament lawn are already showing how this can be achieved – with music, singing and dancing.

Part of reconciling the Police with the people must be ending the obviously failed and sadistic War on Drugs, which has already ended in many American states. It’s insane for Police to be spraying poison on people’s cannabis plants when states such as Washington and Oregon have already advanced beyond medicinal cannabis to medicinal psychedelics. Even Thailand, whose cannabis laws were infamously much harsher than New Zealand’s 20 years ago, has now legalised growing cannabis at home.

Colorado legalised cannabis in 2014, and they now have a $US 2.2 billion annual cannabis market. The anti-mandate protests aren’t about cannabis, even though a lot of it has been smoked in Camp Freedom. But the cannabis issue is one of several contributing to the frustration and rage that have fuelled these protests. That Ardern’s Government hasn’t taken the simple and easy measure of legalising cannabis, when all the evidence supports the idea, has convinced many that our ruling class aren’t interested in our well-being.

Until some kind of reconciliation occurs, the New Zealand Police need to be considered an occupying army, acting to bring the New Zealand people into a state of subjugation on behalf of the international banking and finance interests who own the governments of the world.

If you enjoyed reading this essay/article, you can get a compilation of the Best VJMP Essays and Articles of 2020 from Amazon for Kindle or Amazon for CreateSpace (for international readers), or TradeMe (for Kiwis). A compilation of the Best VJMP Essays and Articles of 2019, the Best VJMP Essays and Articles of 2018 and the Best VJMP Essays and Articles of 2017 are also available.

If you would like to support our work in other ways, subscribe to our SubscribeStar fund, or make a donation to our Paypal! Even better, buy any one of our books!

Why Don’t Leftists Support The Truckers?

The basics of our political education teach us that the right is in favour of the land-owning class while the left is in favour of the working class. As such, the right is in favour of the status quo and wants to maintain it, whereas the left is in favour of change and wants revolution. Given these basics, it’s hard to understand why the left opposes the ongoing truckers’ protests in Canada and New Zealand. This essay explains.

It’s rare that one sees the left united for any reason, but they are currently united against the truckers’ protests. Leftist hangouts like Reddit are full of abuse directed at the truckers (see screenshot at top of page), calling them “fuckwits”, “cunts”, “scum”, “feral lunatics” and any other derogatory epithet they can think up. Leftists are currently cheering on the Police looking to break up the protests in Canada.

On a surface level, it seems strange that a movement claiming to represent the working class would refuse to support that class when it stands up against oppression. The energy behind the truckers’ protests mostly comes from anger at oppressive coronavirus measures, in particular mask and vaccine mandates. The protests are therefore anti-fascist, which is precisely what the left claims to be.

It’s doubly stange if one considers that the left threw themselves behind the Black Lives Matter protests of recent times, even though those protests killed people and burned down cities. Why would the left support something as pointlessly destructive as the BLM protests but then say that the truckers’ protests were “a redneck paradise of delusion and ignorance”, as Martyn Bradbury did?

The reason for the left’s refusal to support the truckers’ protests is that most of the truckers are from the white working class.

The truth is that the left hates the white working class. Utterly despises them. The left believes that the working class should give all their power and support to the leftists and then fuck off back to labouring. The attitude of today’s left towards the working class is less like that of brothers in solidarity and more like that of farmers towards their cattle.

In fact, the working class has been driven out of leftist movements all over the Western World. There are no working-class whites in either the Green or Labour parties of New Zealand. Today’s left is almost entirely comprised of middle-class discontents. These discontents, on account of their great class privilege, have lost touch with reality.

The result of this lost touch with reality has been the inability to see the massive hypocrisy in their current positions.

The left claims to be for the working class, but they hate the white working class most of all. Leftist dogma has it that the reason why the non-white working class is poor is because of racist oppression. The non-white working class hasn’t been given their opportunities to ascend the status ladder yet, but the white working class has already been given these opportunities and has squandered them. As such, the white working class doesn’t deserve help or support.

Today’s left has redefined ‘working-class’ to mean ‘those at the top of the progressive stack‘. This term refers to a hierarchy of victimhood, in which people at the top deserve the most support and people at the bottom the least. The overwhelmingly white and male truckers are at the bottom of this stack. As such, they are enemies and not allies. The truckers, being white and male, ought to know their place, which is to be broken, submissive and penitent.

The end result of the leftists’ rejection of white, working-class men is that those men no longer have a voice in the political system, despite having done more than any other group to build the Western World and to keep the lights on. There are only two places this can lead.

The first, apparently desired by leftists, are that those white working-class men are exterminated, or at least marginalised even further into total irrelevance. The second, already predicted by VJM Publishing, is that those men throw their support in behind an anti-Establishment movement.

When a genuine anti-Establishment movement arises, those supporting these truckers’ protests will support that movement. When they do, they will face opposition from the Establishment’s apparatus of propaganda in the mainstream media. Foreshadowing of this opposition can already be seen in the Establishment’s reaction to the truckers’ protests. Working-class protesters must now understand that the left has abandoned them.

If you would like to support our work in other ways, subscribe to our SubscribeStar fund, or make a donation to our Paypal! Even better, buy any one of our books!

How They Bred Us For Docility

George Carlin was right when he said that we have owners, who own us. The world is not really a patchwork of nations, but a series of farms, in which human livestock breeders have created a population of docile animals that can be milked for profits and taxes, forever. This essay explains how we’ve been bred for maximum passivity so that we never challenge our owners.

The basic modus operandi is for the human livestock breeders to tell blatant lies, to force those lies on the population, and then to destroy anyone who resists the lies. The resisters will always be the most aggressive of the herd, so by destroying them the herd is selected for docility.

This process began in the West with Christianity. Every Westerner with a functioning brain knows that Rabbi Yeshua ben Yosef is not the exclusive god who we are all obliged to worship else we burn in eternal hellfire. But for 1,200 years, between the murder of Hypatia and the Greco-Roman Renaissance, anyone who questioned the exclusive divinity of Rabbi Yeshua was either murdered or ostracised.

Because the people questioning the Christian lies were the intelligent, the honest and the courageous, and because these people were destroyed by the human livestock breeders, the net result was that the genes coding for intelligence, honesty and courage became less frequent, and the genes coding for stupidity, dishonesty and cowardice became more frequent.

This was all by design.

After centuries of people getting killed for speaking the truth, Westerners learned not to think for themselves. Thinking for yourself was dangerous, because it led to you getting killed by Christian mobs. So we learned to look to authority to tell us what’s true and what isn’t true. Along the way, we became passive, submissive, weak.

From around 1600, when Christianity started to lose its deathgrip on Western society, people became able to speak out against it without getting punished. The murder of Giordano Bruno by Christians in 1600 marked the end point of a period that had begun with the murder of Hypatia. Although Christians kept murdering people for not following their cult, their zealotry waned as it lost support, and the natural aggression of Westerners returned.

The period from 1750 to 1950 was marked by extreme volatility. Revolutionary movements sprang up all over the West, with people everywhere happy to risk death for freedoms. The end result was, by 1950, the highest standard of living for the common man that history had ever known. So the ruling class, terrified of where this could have led, launched the War on Drugs to beat people back down.

The War on Drugs was effectively just another form of the same breeding-for-docility process that Christianity had been. Just as intelligent people knew that Rabbi Yeshua was not exclusively divine, people also knew that cannabis and magic mushrooms were not so harmful that users deserved to go to prison for using them. But the ruling class pushed the War on Drugs on us anyway, for the same reason they pushed Christianity on us.

Intelligent, honest and courageous people continued to use cannabis and the psychedelics despite the legal status of these sacraments. And the authorities continued to persecute them with prison or even death, as they did to non-Christians for centuries. The net result was similar: a strong selection pressure in favour of submission and docility.

Mass immigration is a third example of the same phenomenon. Everyone knows that the mass immigration of Third World cheap labour does not increase the standard of living of the average native. But, as with Christianity and the War on Drugs, anyone speaking out against the lies was smashed. People weren’t murdered or imprisoned for opposing mass immigration, but they were ostracised from polite society, which had the same dysgenic effect.

Finally, in recent years, we have Covid “vaccines”. Without even ascertaining that the vaccines are effective, Western authorities have persecuted anyone not taking them, shutting them out of normal life, barring them from accessing many shops and services, and hounding them through the mainstream media.

Those resisting the vaccine mandates have been treated in a similar fashion to those resisting Christianity, the War on Drugs or mass immigration: they have been shunned and abused. As past resisters have been demonised as heretics, druggies or Nazis, people resisting vaccine mandates have been dubbed “anti-vaxxers” and have been blamed for killing people’s grandmothers.

These four examples are all forms of the same phenomenon: the ruling class pushes something obviously false, knowing that only the docile will go along with such an obscene falsehood. The intelligent, the honest and the courageous stand up to resist the falsehoods, and are duly smashed by the authorities and their lackeys in the justice system.

The end result is a population brutalised into submission, bred for docility in the same way that aurochs were bred into modern cattle.

If you would like to support our work in other ways, subscribe to our SubscribeStar fund, or make a donation to our Paypal! Even better, buy any one of our books!

The Purpose Of Mass Immigration Is, And Always Was, To Suppress Wages

The Western World has had mass immigration of cheap labour for over half a century now. When it began, we were told that it was going to make us all richer by growing our economies. When it didn’t make us richer, we were told that we were benefitting from it anyway on account of the cultural benefits of diversity. By 2022, the propaganda isn’t working any more. Now, the ruling classes admit what intelligent working-class people knew all along.

The reality is that the entire purpose of mass immigration was to suppress wages. This was why it was introduced in the first place.

Mass immigration of cheap labour was pushed by the international banking and finance interests who won World War Two, knowing that the nationalists who would have resisted them were defeated. So those international banking and finance interests were free to demand whatever they wanted – and what they wanted was cheap labour.

Basic economics tells us that the price of any good or service is a function of its supply and demand. Increasing the supply of any good or service lowers its price, and decreasing the supply of any good or service raises its price. This logic is so well established that it’s taught to high school economics students all around the world.

The ownership class of the West has strenuously denied this basic economic logic ever since the mass importation of cheap labour began. Increasing the supply of labour would actually make workers richer, they claimed, because of some magical network effect that would lead to a rising economic tide lifting all boats. Opponents of mass immigration were declared to be guilty of something called The Lump of Labour fallacy.

These lies no longer convince the masses. The average worker is now so much poorer than 30 years ago that only the absolute dumbest of them still believes that mass immigration has been beneficial to anyone besides the ownership classes. The propaganda is no longer having the same effect – people have now caught on to the fact that the point of all the immigration was to suppress wages.

This was even admitted by the Irish Central Bank, who raised concerns that there weren’t enough immigrants coming into Ireland to have the desired “wage-dampening effect”. According to the bank, “sustained increases in net inward migration will be needed in the coming years to ensure that growth will be not impeded by labour supply constraints.” Apparently fair wages for native workers are an impediment to the most important thing of all: economic growth.

The same truth has also been admitted in New Zealand, where Lincoln University researcher Dr David Dyason conceded that “as labour supply tightens, the competition between industries to source students and other employees is expected to increase. This would lead to wage and salary increases.” The ruling class now appears unable to deny the basic economic logic that increasing the supply of cheap labour decreases wages.

The statistics bear this out. In the 12 months to November 2021, Kiwi salaries increased by a record 7.6 percent, and the total amount paid to workers in that time period increased by 9.6 percent. The reason for these massive increases is simple: because of immigration restrictions brought about by the coronavirus pandemic, employers were no longer able to undercut Kiwi workers by importing cheap labour from overseas.

The reality is that there’s nothing that benefits the native working classes more than restricting the supply of cheap labour. By the same token, however, there’s nothing that benefits the ownership classes less than restricting the supply of cheap labour. That’s why employers all over the Western World are bitching about “labour shortages”.

A “labour shortage” is the name given to the phenomenon of a low level of labour supply driving up the price. The price of labour, in the minds of our ruling class, is supposed to only go one way – down. That’s because labour is considered an expense to be minimised. The fact that the price of labour equals the prosperity of the working classes is ignored – the working classes aren’t considered people.

Employers all over the West are united when it comes to solving “labour shortages”: open the borders, let the cheap labour in. This unity exposes the fact that border control restricting the flow of cheap labour is extremely beneficial to the native working classes.

The Establishment has an entire mainstream media apparatus dedicated to denying this obvious reality. Convoluted reasons are given for why the mass immigration of cheap labour somehow makes us all better off – our countries are underpopulated, our countries are too white, better food, immigrants do the jobs natives are too lazy to etc. Then, if this nonsense doesn’t convince someone, they are simply smeared as racists.

The facts are these. The ownership classes and the international banking and finance interests are the only beneficiaries of the mass importation of cheap labour. Everyone else loses. Therefore, it can be confidently stated that anyone in favour of the mass importation of cheap labour is an enemy of the native working class.

If you would like to support our work in other ways, subscribe to our SubscribeStar fund, or make a donation to our Paypal! Even better, buy any one of our books!