Understanding Nationalism vs. Globalism Is The Key To Understanding The Political Landscape of 2022

Mainstream political commentators, most of them wingcucks, are having extreme difficulty understanding the global politics of 2022. The common reaction to the recent electoral success of the Sweden Democrats and the Brothers of Italy is to shriek about far-right-wing extremism. But this is not an accurate way of understanding the phenomena at play.

The truth is that anyone still thinking in terms of left vs. right has a grossly flawed understanding of the political landscape. The relevant political axis in 2022 is globalist vs. nationalist. Only those who think in terms of globalist vs. nationalist can understand the patterns shifting through the mass political consciousness right now.

The only reason why anti-immigration sentiments are considered “far-right” is because Communists were on the winning side of World War II, and assumed control of the Western media shortly afterwards. Because they won, their enemies had to be dismissed as extremists, and because they were left, their enemies had to be dismissed as right. As such, nationalism became incorrectly conflated with the far-right.

This is why, in recent years, we’ve been spun a narrative of the pro-immigration left and the anti-immigration right.

In reality, the right is more than happy to support the mass immigration of cheap labour. Incoming British Prime Minister, Conservative Leader Liz Truss, has promised to open the immigration floodgates, with today’s “Conservative” logic apparently reduced to a simple equation: migration = growth.

So if the conservative right wing is in favour of the mass immigration of cheap labour, on account of that it pushes rents up and wages down and thereby makes the rich richer and the poor poorer, then the left wing must be against the mass immigration of cheap labour. Right?

Wrong. Apparently the left wing is also in favour of the mass immigration of cheap labour, as is the far-left. And so, by some twisted logic, opposing the mass immigration of cheap labour is far-right.

Moreover, the globalist religious elements of the right wing also want mass Third World immigration. For many Christian fundamentalists, borders and national sentiments are an impediment to God’s command that all are one in Rabbi Yeshua. To that end, they’re happy to import as many non-whites as possible, reasoning that the blending of the nations will hasten Rabbi Yeshua’s return.

If far-right corporate interests want mass Third World immigration, and if far-right religious interests want mass Third World immigration, then it does not make any sense to say that opposing mass Third World immigration is a far-right position. If far-right nationalist interests oppose it, then the relevant aspect is the nationalist one.

When it comes to immigration and labour rights, it’s time to forget left vs. right. Adherence to neither left nor right has much predictive value in this matter. The only logical approach to such questions is to think in terms of nationalist vs. globalist.

The nationalist approach to immigration is that it must serve the interests of the nation. This is not inherently an anti-immigration attitude. It means that immigration from low-IQ countries must be forbidden. Those immigrants tend to produce low-IQ offspring who cannot meet the cognitive demands of Western societies, and who end up becoming net drains on their host societies.

A reasonable nationalist would not necessarily disagree with immigration from high-IQ countries, unless it was of sufficient volume to disrupt social cohesion. Most nationalists make a clear distinction between ‘compatible’ and ‘incompatible’ cultures when it comes to immigration, but one thing is always agreed upon – immigration of low-IQ people from incompatible cultures has to stop.

The globalist approach to immigration, by contrast, is the more the merrier. Every extra labour unit pushes up house prices by increasing demand for housing, and pushes down wages by increasing the supply of labour. In other words: the more immigration, the more the rich get richer and the more the poor get poorer.

Globalist logic is that it doesn’t matter if the native working classes earn enough money to own homes and raise families. The most important thing is the profits of the international banking and finance interests, and these profits are maximised by maximum immigration. Any disruption this might cause to the ordinary lives of working-class people is not considered important.

This globalist arrogance has led to nationalist sentiments, not right-wing sentiments, rising all around the Western World.

It’s important to note that the globalist far-right is not rising much, if at all. The ACT Party is doing reasonably well in New Zealand, polling at about 10%. But this has less to do with the rise of the far-right and more to do with the lack of confidence in the mainstream conservative National Party.

Few of the young men who are flooding into the alternative right (to which ACT belongs) are agitating for more cheap labour or greater corporate control, much less for medieval-style theocracy. As such, their sentiments are best understood as the masculine expression of a nationalist mentality. That masculinity is associated with the right is secondary; nationalist interests are primary.

The electoral success of Giorgia Meloni’s party demonstrates that a feminine expression of nationalism is now rising to join the masculine expression. With both masculine and feminine aspects of nationalism rising, the return of nationalism to the main stage is inevitable. Understanding today’s political reality requires that one think in terms appropriate to these developments. The future is nationalist vs. globalist.

If you enjoyed reading this essay/article, you can get a compilation of the Best VJMP Essays and Articles from 2021 from Amazon for Kindle or Amazon for CreateSpace (for international readers), or TradeMe (for Kiwis). Compilations of the Best VJMP Essays and Articles of 2020, the Best VJMP Essays and Articles of 2019, the Best VJMP Essays and Articles of 2018 and the Best VJMP Essays and Articles of 2017 are also available.

If you would like to support our work in other ways, subscribe to our SubscribeStar fund, or make a donation to our Paypal! Even better, buy any one of our books!

What The Sweden Democrats’ Electoral Success Could Mean For Nationalism Elsewhere

Globalism suffered a shocking blow this week when the Sweden Democrats, the long-decried nationalist party, won the second-largest share of the vote in the Swedish General Election. Party Leader Jimmie Akesson has now become the most influential man in Swedish politics, if not Western politics. What he and his party have achieved was thought impossible by most as recently as a decade ago.

Akesson’s party won 20.5% of the total vote, which made the Sweden Democrats the largest faction within the majority centre-right bloc. As the largest party within the largest bloc, Akesson has an excellent chance of becoming Prime Minister. If so, he would be the first Swedish Prime Minister outside the Establishment parties for almost 40 years.

It’s a result that could have implications for the entire world.

Decades of relentless globalist propaganda has convinced the West that anyone who believed in their own nation was a war criminal waiting to happen. Opposing immigration, we are told, is the first step on a slippery slope that leads to gas chambers. It is therefore the moral imperative of every human being to open their country’s borders as wide as possible.

In recent years, the brutal reality has hit home. Supporting immigration, it turns out, was not actually the morally superior choice, as it amounted to supporting mass violence and rape against one’s own population. Far from being grateful for the opportunity to live in a wealthy country, the Muslims and Africans who were let into Sweden took every advantage they could from the locals. The ensuing long-simmering rage is what has pushed the Sweden Democrats to their current heights.

Akesson is a genius who has very skillfully managed to walk the tightrope between self-respect and supremacism. In the 17 years he has led the party, he has successfully purged it of most of its unreasonable elements, while maintaining enough support to remain in the Riksdag (the Swedish Parliament). Accusations of ‘racist’ and ‘Nazi’ no longer have much electoral impact.

His party has won most of its support through its criticism of Sweden’s insane immigration policy, which is based on the Jewish Position of all human subgroups being identical in all intellectual and behavioural measures. This policy has seen the Swedish Government flood the country with over a million Muslims and Africans over the past 25 years, causing immense suffering.

Globalists such as Jerry Sarnecki, Barbara Spectre and Peter Wolodarski strenuously denied the reality of the immigration disaster, smearing all critics as genocidal supremacists. But, as the Buddha noted, the truth cannot be long hidden. People eventually came to realise the truth about the mass immigration of Third Worlders.

The bitter truth is that intelligence is mostly genetic, and education has only a limited impact. As such, it’s impossible to import large numbers of low-IQ people and simply educate them to be as smart as high-IQ Westerners or Far East Asians. The reality is that low-IQ people will mostly produce low-IQ offspring, and those offspring will inevitably end up criminal delinquents at a rate far exceeding that of the native population.

This shouldn’t surprise anyone, because it’s commonly understood that low-IQ white people cause far more suffering than high-IQ white people. Low-IQ white people commit more violent crime, more sex crime and more property crime than high-IQ white people, and most people accept this without question. So it shouldn’t have been a surprise that other low-IQ people would also commit high amounts of such crimes.

The globalists gambled that the new Swedes would end up identical to the old Swedes through accumulating social capital over time. After all, globalist dogma states unequivocally that we’re all the same underneath the skin. Unfortunately, they risked the whole Western World on this, and lost. Now we have to pay the price – a brutal reduction in living standards.

Akesson was dead right when he claimed that the Third Worlders would end up causing chaos and misery for the European natives. Over the past 15 years, his predictions have been proven correct time and time again. Today, when there are 19,000 English girls raped by foreign grooming gangs every year, Akesson looks like a visionary.

Akesson has demonstrated that nationalism can be mainstream. Nationalism doesn’t have to be about the disaffected, the resentful and the anti-social. To the contrary: those who genuinely love their own people will begin by loving themselves, and will allow that love to radiate outwards to their family, community and nation. Akesson has managed to present nationalism in a way that appeals to a herd heavily brainwashed to reject it.

The main consequence of the Sweden Democrats’ success will be the legitimisation and normalisation of nationalist sentiments all across the Western World. Vast numbers of people have always suspected that the globalists weren’t telling them the truth – the Sweden Democrats’ success is a physical manifestation of how many others think the same way. If they can get 20% in Sweden, many will reason, we can get at least 5% here.

Akesson and the Sweden Democrats have shown that none of us are alone.

If you would like to support our work in other ways, subscribe to our SubscribeStar fund, or make a donation to our Paypal! Even better, buy any one of our books!

Nationalists Won 10% in Aussie – Could They Do The Same in New Zealand?

The Australian Federal Election earlier this month saw incumbent Prime Minister Scott Morrison thrown out for Labour Leader Anthony Albanese. Although this was predicted by many, few predicted how little support the two major Establishment parties would get. Even fewer predicted such a strong nationalist vote.

Australian dissatisfaction with the ruling class has not been this high ever. In 1910, Labor and the Coalition combined won 95.1% of the vote. In 1949 they won 96.3%. As recently as 1993 it was 89.2%. But after the advent of neoliberalism, support for Establishment parties has collapsed.

By 2010 the combined vote for the Establishment Left and the Establishment Right had fallen to 81.3%. By 2013 it was 79%, by 2016 it was 76.7%, by 2019 it was 74.7% and by 2022 it was 68.9%. The pattern is stark and unidirectional. Support for the Establishment in general is falling fast in Australia, as it is in most other Western countries.

This falling support for the Australian Establishment reflects the falling standard of living across the Western World. People are less satisfied than ever about the way their countries are being run. Housing is rapidly becoming unaffordable even in countries as wealthy as Australia – the average house price in Sydney is now AUD1,600,000, which is an enormous amount of money even with Aussie wages.

Like most Westerners, Australians feel like they’re getting poorer, and have done for a while. Not only is the increasing cost of living making it hard for Australian families, but there is no sign on the horizon of things getting any better. Elections are often won or lost on economic perceptions. As such, it’s not surprising to have seen a swing against the incumbent powers this year.

A more surprising feature of the 2022 Australian election was the resurgence of nationalist movements.

Pauline Hanson’s One Nation Party was the 4th biggest party, with 628,254 votes, and Clive Palmer’s United Australia Party was 5th with 522,283. Adding Bob Katter’s Australian Party takes the nationalist vote to over 9%. Considering the nationalist sentiments of some of the independents it is fair to suggest that the full nationalist vote was around 10%.

This nationalist vote is the result of increasing awareness of the failures of globalism. Australians, like most Westerners, have now figured out that globalism just means lower wages, higher rents, and more crime. All the benefits that we were promised accrued to those who already had wealth. The rest of us just lost out.

The globalist Establishment doesn’t care about the electorate swinging back and forth on the left-right spectrum. They control both the left and the right anyway. What they’re really worried about is a resurgence of nationalism. This creates the possibility of putting someone in power who the Establishment doesn’t already control.

The two major nationalist movements in Australia together won about 10% of the total vote, which raises the question: could a similar nationalist movement win 10% of the vote in New Zealand?

The collapse of the New Zealand First Party (polling at a mere 1% according to latest numbers) means that nationalist narratives have fallen out of the popular consciousness in New Zealand. The mainstream media, on behalf of its globalist owners, presents us with a choice between the globalist left and the globalist right. Nationalist ideas are unthinkable.

But if nationalist movements can get 10% of the vote in Australia, there’s every reason to think they could do similarly well in New Zealand. Kiwis have also been poorly served by globalism, which has also sent our productive capacity overseas while flooding our neighbourhoods with cheap labour. We have very similar attitudes to Australians when it comes to such things.

It would certainly be an uphill struggle.

Because nationalism is equated so closely to Nazism in the propaganda and brainwashing machine that is the mainstream media, any new nationalist movement in New Zealand could expect to get smeared as white supremacists immediately, and compared to Brenton Tarrant.

But nationalist movements have done well in New Zealand before. New Zealand First won 10% of the vote as recently as 2002, as voters realised that Helen Clark was happy to destroy the New Zealand working class through the mass importation of cheap Third World labour, and sought an alternative.

The Establishment has worked hard to smear New Zealand First as a racist party (despite Dan McGlashan showing that pro-NZF sentiments are stronger among Maoris than among anyone else). If Peters’s party makes a resurgence, as some are predicting it to, or if a new nationalist movement rises up, the wrecking machine will surely swing into action again.

If one unified nationalist movement won 10% of the seats in the New Zealand, they could easily draw concessions from either of the globalist right or the globalist left blocs. An end to the War on Drugs as well as an end to the mass importation of Third World cheap labour might be possible.

If you enjoyed reading this essay/article, you can get a compilation of the Best VJMP Essays and Articles from 2021 from Amazon for Kindle or Amazon for CreateSpace (for international readers), or TradeMe (for Kiwis). A compilation of the Best VJMP Essays and Articles of 2020, the Best VJMP Essays and Articles of 2019, the Best VJMP Essays and Articles of 2018 and the Best VJMP Essays and Articles of 2017 are also available.

If you would like to support our work in other ways, subscribe to our SubscribeStar fund, or make a donation to our Paypal! Even better, buy any one of our books!

VJMP Anzac Day Address 2022: A Foundation Myth for the Anzac Nation

With the news that America intends to respond to China’s move towards militarising the Solomon Islands, it seems apparent that Northern Australia will now become a militarised zone. If China does establish a base there, America will inevitably establish one to counter it in Far North Queensland. The Anzac nation seems to be preparing itself physically for war.

The Anzac nation also needs to prepare itself metaphysically for war. This must involve reflection upon why divine forces would have called us into existence in the first place.

In the opinion of this author, the Fall of Singapore could serve as a kind of origin myth for the Anzac nation. This was the closest we ever came to destruction at the hands of a hostile outside force. But thanks to the exceptional bravery and warfighting skills of our ancestors, and assistance from some close friends, we overcame that challenge.

That the Fall of Singapore was followed by Japanese defeats, at the Battle of the Coral Sea and at the Battle of Milne Bay, can be attributed to divine favour protecting the nascent Anzac nation. The foundational myth of the Anzac nation holds that this divine favour is still with us, and will guide us safely through the 21st Century and beyond.

An element of our national myth ought to be that we are inherently more likeable than our enemies, and as such have a moral right to triumph. This is because we are originally good, honest men and women who stood up to corrupt power structures and were exiled for it. This shared history is the basis of our national moral imperative of a “fair go”.

If there is to be war in or around Northern Australia, we will need to make sure to win the propaganda war at the same time. Winning this soft war will heavily influence the extent to which we are to gather support for the hard war. So we need to establish in the minds of the world that we are more likable than other nationalities.

For the most part, this will not be too difficult, because many people have had experience with Anzac travellers, and most of those experiences have been positive. For every drunken bogan we send overseas we send several cultured and educated people. So those of us who cannot contribute to the hard war can still contribute to the soft war.

The foremost work in this soft war ought to be spiritual. The most heavily-armed and most well-liked force can still lose if they don’t have spiritual wealth. Manifesting this wealth into the material world is the true work of the Anzac nation in the 21st Century.

The Anzac nation should hold, as part of our foundation myth, that we are destined the lead the rest of Planet Earth into a spiritual Golden Age. We are uniquely suited for this role owing to the fact that psilocybin mushrooms grow plentifully here, including the world’s most potent version, the psilocybe subaeruginosa.

That the world’s most powerful subspecies of arguably the world’s most powerful spiritual sacrament is endemic to the Anzac islands can only mean one thing: that divinity itself has chosen us for spiritual leadership in this new age of the world.

Australia and New Zealand already have some of the world’s most psychedelic-friendly populations. Apart from the West Coast of North America, there are few places with the widespread experience of using psychedelic sacraments that Aussies and Kiwis have. Psychedelic sacrament use is an established element of our festival culture, and any Anzac who has ever truly wanted a psychedelic experience has been able to have one.

Fittingly, Australia is the location of the world’s first psilocybin mushroom trial. Subconciously, it may be that many Anzacs understand the role of magic mushrooms in the future spiritual health of this nation. Let it be said that our role is to bring a new understanding of the perennial spiritual philosophy to the entire world.

Supporting this sentiment is the fact that Aussies are the 18th and Kiwis the 15th heaviest users (out of 164) of that other common spiritual sacrament of the Indo-European people: cannabis. We Anzacs love our spiritual sacraments, which is why we are able to produce genius-tier animated film like Choomer Island 2, one of the greatest explications of spiritual truth produced this century.

Let us let it be said that God spared the Anzac nation during World War II because God wished for us to play a role in promulgating God’s Will in the next Great Age of the Earth. In return for this favour, the Anzac nation is tasked with spreading true knowledge about spirituality and how certain natural sacramental substances can be used to reconnect with the divine.

A foundation myth that explained how we Anzacs have divine favour in all of the past, present and future is something that needs to be added to the national consciousness.

If you enjoyed reading this essay/article, you can get a compilation of the Best VJMP Essays and Articles from 2021 from Amazon for Kindle or Amazon for CreateSpace (for international readers), or TradeMe (for Kiwis). A compilation of the Best VJMP Essays and Articles of 2020, the Best VJMP Essays and Articles of 2019, the Best VJMP Essays and Articles of 2018 and the Best VJMP Essays and Articles of 2017 are also available.

If you would like to support our work in other ways, subscribe to our SubscribeStar fund, or make a donation to our Paypal! Even better, buy any one of our books!