1. The Fundamental Feminine Attitude is the will to impose chaos upon order.
2. Femininity is depicted as blue, which represents the sorrow that follows from the suffering caused by false or excess order.
3. The will to impose chaos upon order is ultimately inspired by the rejection of suffering. The feminine assumes authority of the local environment and imposes chaos upon the order that causes suffering.
4. The Fundamental Feminine Attitude is expressed in the material world through both the masculine and the feminine elements.
5. Femininity in the aspect of clay involves a determination to raise one’s offspring to adulthood. Action here nurtures the young of one’s own kin.
6. Femininity in the aspect of iron involves physical devotion. This aspect of femininity is devoted to the natural order of the body. Action here leads to a healthy body.
7. Femininity in the aspect of silver involves intellectual devotion. This aspect of femininity is devoted to the natural order of the mind. Action here leads to a healthy mind.
8. Femininity in the aspect of gold involves spiritual devotion. This aspect of femininity is devoted to the natural order of the consciousness. Action here leads to a healthy consciousness.
9. Femininity in the aspect of earth involves devotion to one’s offspring. This involves meeting their needs, so that they can themselves grow to have rectitude and devotion.
10. Femininity in the aspect of water involves devotion to oneself. This involves meeting one’s own needs, so that one can continue to express rectitude and devotion.
11. Femininity in the aspect of air involves devotion to one’s friends. This involves meeting the needs of the others in one’s community and society, so that those others can express rectitude and devotion.
12. Femininity in the aspect of fire involves devotion to the divine. The involves understanding that the only reason to be devoted to anything is to further the divine plan.
13. For the feminine, even sexual reproduction involves the imposition of chaos upon order, because the zygote will grow into a living creature that can take many kinds of potential actions.
14. The ultimate act of chaos is to produce new life, for this life has free will and is therefore an unpredictable and chaotic element.
15. Successful application of the Fundamental Masculine Attitude leads to devotion.
16. A failure to apply the Fundamental Feminine Attitude leads to an excess of order, which becomes rigidity and suffocation, which leads to suffering.
17. It can therefore be said that the essence of femininity is devotion, which is the same as the will to impose chaos upon false or excess order.
18. A respectable woman is one who has devotion to rectitude. Through this quality, all other good qualities of both femininity and masculinity are possible.
*
This chapter is an excerpt from Elemental Elementalism, the foundational scripture of the new religion of the Age of Aquarius.
1. The feminine elements are waypoints along the Great Feminine Axis.
2. These elements represent different vibrations, all of which inherently have equal value.
3. There are an infinite number of ways of dividing the Great Feminine Axis into elements. Some of these configurations make more sense than others. The most popular are the twofold, threefold, fourfold and eightfold divisions.
4. The fourfold division of the Great Feminine Axis is represented by the four classical elements of earth, water, air and fire.
5. The first element, nearest the Autumn Pole, is earth, represented by green.
6. Earth is the most feminine of the feminine elements, and is experienced as cold and dry.
7. The vibration of earth is experienced as melancholy, but it also has an aspect of healing.
8. The second element, immediately to the right of earth, is water, represented by blue.
9. Increasing the vibration of earth will cause its hexahedrons to break down into icosahedrons and become water.
10. Water is more energetic than earth, and is experienced as cold and wet.
11. The vibration of water is experienced as phlegmatic, but it also has an aspect of sociability.
12. The third element, immediately to the right of water, is air, represented by yellow.
13. Increasing the vibration of water will cause its icosahedrons to break down into octahedrons and become air.
14. Air is more energetic than water, and is experienced as hot and wet.
15. The vibration of air is experienced as sanguine, but it also has an aspect of sedulousness.
16. The fourth element, immediately to the right of air and nearest the Spring Pole, is fire, represented by red.
17. Increasing the vibration of air will cause its octahedrons to break down into tetrahedrons and become fire.
18. Fire is the most masculine of the feminine elements, and is experienced as hot and dry.
19. The vibration of fire is experienced as choleric, but it also has an aspect of righteousness.
20. All of the feminine elements inherently have equal value, but some will have more value in the immediate environment than others.
21. In an environment of rest, the vibration of earth will have the most value, and will cause consciousness to rise furthest up the Great Masculine Axis. Other vibrations will cause consciousness to rise less far, or to fall.
22. In an environment of love, the vibration of water will have the most value, and will cause consciousness to rise furthest up the Great Masculine Axis. Other vibrations will cause consciousness to rise less far, or to fall.
23. In an environment of sport, the vibration of air will have the most value, and will cause consciousness to rise furthest up the Great Masculine Axis. Other vibrations will cause consciousness to rise less far, or to fall.
24. In an environment of war, the vibration of fire will have the most value, and will cause consciousness to rise furthest up the Great Masculine Axis. Other vibrations will cause consciousness to rise less far, or to fall.
25. Expression of the correct vibration on the Great Feminine Axis will always cause a consciousness to ascend the Great Masculine Axis.
26. Expression of the incorrect vibration on the Great Feminine Axis will always cause a consciousness to descend the Great Feminine Axis.
27. Achieving one’s Aspirations is fundamentally a matter of expressing the right vibration at the right time.
*
This chapter is an excerpt from Elemental Elementalism, the foundational scripture of the new religion of the Age of Aquarius.
The greatest controversy in psychological science today – perhaps in all science – is that regarding the heritability of intelligence. Although the science itself is reasonably clear, the topic is so heavily politicised that certain positions have become entrenched.
The anti-hereditarian side can be dubbed the Jewish Position. This is for two reasons. One – the foremost supporters of the position are all Jews, and two – almost all Jews adhere to this position. Both of these assertions become clear if one examines the history of the debate around the heredity of intelligence.
Franz Boas was the earliest major opponent of the hereditarian position. Born in Germany to Jewish parents, Wikipedia says of him that “Boas’s main project was to distinguish between biological and cultural heredity, and to focus on the cultural processes that he believed had the greatest influence over social life”.
This belief – that cultural influences have the greater influence on human behaviour and biological ones the lesser, or none at all – is the Jewish Position in a nutshell.
Boas introduced the concept of cultural relativism to the psychological sciences. Before him, it was assumed that the more civilised a culture was, the superior. After him, it was claimed that no-one could say that any culture was superior to any other. This attitude, which is essentially that of slave morality, is political and not scientific in nature. It’s the attitude of someone who promotes tolerance for the sake of tolerance and not for the sake of alleviating suffering.
When Boas’s supposed finding that American and European whites have significantly different skull sizes was proven to have been made up, Jewish professor Jonathan Marks defended his co-ethnic, claiming that those who had debunked Boas had themselves “been quickly rebutted by more mainstream biological anthropology.”
According to Marks’s Wikipedia page, he is “skeptical of genetic explanations of human behavior” and “of ‘race’ as a biological category.” These two attitudes are core components of the Jewish Position, the intent of which is to encourage out-group favouritism and to discourage in-group favouritism. As such, it strenuously denies any scientific evidence that suggests an out-group might be genetically inclined to behave violently or criminally.
Marks once wrote, citing fellow Jew Richard Lewontin (see below) that “…the point of the theory of race was to discover large clusters of people that are principally homogeneous within and heterogeneous between, contrasting groups. Lewontin’s analysis shows that such groups do not exist in the human species…” The Jewish Position denies that race is an valid concept.
Boas heavily influenced co-ethnic Elliot Aronson, born in 1932. Aronson’s ‘Nobody Left to Hate‘ continued the established Jewish trope that exclusion is to blame for pathological behaviour. The book suggested that the reason for the Columbine High School shooting may have been that Klebold and Harris had been excluded by the other students, and therefore the solution to violence is to reduce out-group antipathy.
Central to the Jewish Position is the idea that all exclusion on the basis of genetic or biological grounds is inherently immoral. Further, any in-group preference exercised on genetic or biological grounds is immoral. Proponents of the Jewish Position draw a connection between border control and concentration camps. For them, all lines between folk groups – whether lines of inclusion or exclusion – are evil.
Also born in the 1930s was Richard Lewontin. Lewontin pushed the Jewish Position so hard, a fallacy was named after him. A stubborn opponent of genetic determinism, Lewontin’s approach was typical of the Marxist that he proudly claimed to be. As is often the case with both Jews and Marxists, he opposed genetic determinism in part because it downplays the value of social activism.
Lewontin was one of the harshest critics of Edward O. Wilson’s landmark work Sociobiology. As is typical of those pushing the Jewish Position, his criticism of the work equated genetic determinism with fascism. He went on to co-write, with two other Jewish authors, a book called ‘Not In Our Genes‘, a groundbreaking work of biology denial.
One of the co-authors, Steven Rose, was from Britain, whereas the other two were from America. This reveals the degree to which the Jewish Position is supranational: Jews everywhere believe it, no matter which country they’re living in. In Australia, South Africa, Brazil, just as in America and Europe – everywhere there are Jews, the Jewish Position is asserted.
Lewontin collaborated closely with Stephen Jay Gould, another co-ethnic who prominently supported the Jewish Position. Gould had no shame about equating genetic determinism with Nazism, going as far as to blame people who believe in IQ science for the Holocaust. Gould took issue with anyone who believed in border control at all, also equating this to Nazism.
Gould was criticised for his 1981 propaganda masterpiece, The Mismeasure of Man, in which he smeared intelligence researchers as racists. It has been observed that “Gould’s Marxist political beliefs made him attack intelligence research because he saw it as a threat to his egalitarian social goals.” Ironically, Gould was aware that a person’s social goals affected what that person considered to be accurate science. He just didn’t apply this criticism to himself.
Robert Wright wrote in a letter to the New York Review of Books that “many evolutionary biologists consider Gould’s writings a serious impediment to popular understanding of Darwinian thought.” This is of true of everyone who takes the Jewish Position, which in its essence prioritises political expedience over truth and knowledge. It is a form of science denial, in particular biology denial.
The most prominent Jewish anti-hereditarian in popular culture today is Jared Diamond. Diamond’s most famous work, Guns, Germs and Steel, sought to show that the European dominace of recent centuries was a geographical fluke and not due to any inherent genetic superiority. According to Diamond, if Africans had had more plants suitable for domestication and a more pronounced East-West axis, they would have dominated the world instead.
In Guns, Germs and Steel, Diamond describes as “loathsome” the use of biological differences to explain economic outcomes. Yet, as a critique of Diamond’s points out, Diamond’s environmental determinism cannot account for why natural resource-poor Japan is wealthy, or why natural resource-wealthy Nigeria is poor. A biological determinist, aware that the most valuable human capital is the IQ of the people, can easily account for both.
The most prominent Jewish anti-hereditarian in academia today is Robert Sternberg. Sternberg is foremost in pushing nonsense like stereotype threat, the laughable idea that the low academic performance of blacks is because they’ve internalised white supremacist ideas about blacks being dumb.
Stereotype threat has been cited by Jewish researchers such as Joshua Aronson (the son of Elliot menioned above) as the reason for black academic underachievement. The reality is that, like all the other excuses made by people holding the Jewish Position, stereotype threat is a political concept and not a scientific one.
The political conclusion that Sternberg is desperately trying to avoid is that schools ought to be resegregated. To that end, he promotes the narrative that white people are to blame for black underachievement. Sternberg and his stereotype threat narrative claim that blacks only underachieve because white people expect them to, and thus black underachievement is due to white moral failure.
In summary, the Jewish Position is biology denial applied to the subject of human behaviour.
It’s fair to call it the Jewish Position because almost all of the people promoting it are Jews (as mentioned above) and because almost all of the people opposing it (Francis Galton, Ronald Fisher, Charles Darwin, Richard Dawkins, James Watson, Hans Eysenck, Arthur Jensen, Phillipe Rushton, Richard Lynn, Charles Murray, Satoshi Kanazawa, Linda Gottfredson et al.) are non-Jews. Jewish hereditarians, like Richard Herrnstein, are rare.
It’s worth noting that cultures without a heavy Jewish academic and media presence, such as China, India, Japan and Korea, near uniformly reject the Jewish Position. It’s only in the West, which does have a heavy Jewish academic and media presence, where the Jewish Position is taken seriously. Everywhere else, the genetic influence on intelligence is treated much the same as the genetic influence on height, i.e. as an obvious truth.
It’s also worth noting that the Jewish Position is never taken with regards to Israel. Where Israel is concerned, not only are borders and exclusion considered perfectly legitimate, but biological science (in the form of DNA analysis) can even be used to tell if someone is Jewish or not. In Israel, people can have a marriage licence denied if they can’t prove Jewish ancestry by DNA test.
Such policies would result in howls of outrage from all of the Jewish intellectuals mentioned above if any Western country introduced them – yet Israel may do so without a peep of protest.
The reasons why Jews almost uniformly hold the Jewish Position are probably best explained by Kevin MacDonald in his Culture of Critique. It’s enough for this essay to establish the trend that Jews who hold academic positions in the life sciences almost always reject hereditarianism, whereas non-Jews in similar positions in the life sciences almost always accept it.
The sum total of all of these facts is that no-one should ever trust a Jew or anyone pro-Jewish (such as a universalist Abrahamist) when it comes to discussions about heredity and the effect of genetics on human behaviour. They cannot be trusted to be honest on such issues any more than Nazis can, because they have a vested political interest in misrepresenting the truth (an example of what this column has previously called the Palestinian Paradox).
1. The Fundamental Masculine Attitude is the will to impose order upon chaos.
2. Masculinity is depicted as red, which represents the rage arising from the suffering caused by excess chaos.
3. The will to impose order upon chaos is ultimately inspired by the rejection of suffering. The masculine assumes authority of the local environment and imposes an order that keeps the suffering out.
4. The Fundamental Masculine Attitude is expressed in the material world through both the masculine and the feminine elements.
5. Masculinity in the aspect of clay involves determination to survive. This aspect of masculinity imposes order upon death, and thereby upon life.
6. Masculinity in the aspect of iron involves physical rectitude. This aspect of masculinity imposes order upon the body.
7. Masculinity in the aspect of silver involves intellectual rectitude. This aspect of masculinity imposes order upon the mind.
8. Masculinity in the aspect of gold involves spiritual rectitude. This aspect of masculinity imposes order upon the spirit.
9. Masculinity in the aspect of earth involves the fortification of order. This involves making order even more orderly, so that chaos is doubly suppressed.
10. Masculinity in the aspect of water involves the vitalisation of order. This involves strengthening order where it exists but is weakening.
11. Masculinity in the aspect of air involves the refinement of order. This involves smoothing out the cruder aspects of the existing order so that it’s less objectionable.
12. Masculinity in the aspect of fire involves the inspiration of order. This involves the inspiration of the will to impose order upon chaos.
13. For the masculine, even sexual reproduction involves the imposition of order upon chaos, because the sperm cell carries little apart from information.
14. Successful application of the Fundamental Masculine Attitude leads to rectitude.
15. A failure to apply the Fundamental Masculine Attitude leads to the feminine leading the masculine, which leads to chaos and suffering.
16. It can therefore be said that the essence of masculinity is rectitude, which is the same as the will to impose order upon chaos.
17. A respectable man is one who has rectitude. Through this quality, all other good qualities of masculinity are possible.
18. The Fundamental Masculine Atittude is also known as the Overcoming Will, because it’s the energy that leads a person or a group up the right-hand side of the Quadrijitu.
*
This chapter is an excerpt from Elemental Elementalism, the foundational scripture of the new religion of the Age of Aquarius.
