VJM Explains The Mysteries Of Consciousness!

The Elementalist Conception Of Truth And Falsehood

1. All physical, emotional, mental and spiritual truths exist as vibrations within the Great Fractal.

2. This includes all possible scientific, spiritual and philosophical truths, which all exist as vibrations within the metaphysical realms of the Great Fractal.

3. Speaking the truth is a matter of expressing a vibration that is appropriate for the physical, emotional, mental or spiritual environment that one is in.

4. Speaking falsehood is a matter of expressing a vibration that is inappropriate for the physical, emotional, mental or spiritual environment that one is in.

5. Speaking falsehood is usually motivated by a desire for wealth or status.

6. There are two ways to wage war: force and deception.

7. In cases where force is not appropriate, war must be waged by deception, and falsehoods must be spoken.

8. Waging war by deception does not allow one to escape the Law of Assortative Reincarnation. The speaker of truth will reincarnate in a world full of speakers of truth; the speaker of falsehood will reincarnate in a world full of speakers of falsehood.

9. The speaking of truth is the path of peace; the speaking of falsehood is the path of war.

10. The best reason to speak falsehood is to entertain the gods.

11. Reject the truth, and suffer; suffer, and entertain the gods!

12. Expressing falsehood always leads to an amount of suffering that matches the magnitude of the falsehood. This suffering can be physical, emotional, mental or spiritual.

13. The magnitude of a falsehood is the degree to which the vibration expressed differs from the vibration of the environment, multiplied by the number of people who hear this expression, multiplied by the degree those hearers believe the expression.

14. The most egregious of all falsehoods are those which deny the Four Tenets.

15. The most common egregious falsehood is denial of the First Tenet.

16. Much of the suffering in the world is the result of denial of the First Tenet or the Fourth Tenet.

17. Correctly understanding these tenets is to understand that consciousness, in its natural state, knows everything, and therefore all learning is remembering.

18. The best reason to speak truth is to alleviate ignorance, and thereby to alleviate suffering.

19. Skillfully spoken truth will alleviate ignorance as well as entertain the gods.

20. Speaking falsehoods may or may not be a bad thing, if the suffering prevented outweighs the suffering caused, or if the suffering entertains the gods.

This chapter is an excerpt from Elemental Elementalism, the foundational scripture of the new religion of the Age of Aquarius.

If you enjoyed reading this essay/article, you can get a compilation of the Best VJMP Essays and Articles of 2020 from Amazon for Kindle or Amazon for CreateSpace (for international readers), or TradeMe (for Kiwis). A compilation of the Best VJMP Essays and Articles of 2019, the Best VJMP Essays and Articles of 2018 and the Best VJMP Essays and Articles of 2017 are also available.

If you would like to support our work in other ways, please consider subscribing to our SubscribeStar fund. Even better, buy any one of our books!

Open The Door To Islam, Open The Door To Hell

With the terrorist attack at the New Lynn Countdown supermarket last night, Kiwis will now have to live with what Europeans have suffered for the past 20 years: ever-present ambient terror while out in public. The more intelligent Kiwis will soon come to realise something that intelligent Europeans realised 20 years ago: when you open the door to Islam, you consign your country to Hell.

The most predictable thing about the terror attack at the Auckland supermarket was the chorus of cries to not blame Islam. Even though we were told by Jacinda Ardern herself that the Christchurch mosque shootings were the collective responsibility of all white people, we have also been told by Ardern that last night’s terror “was carried out by an individual – not a faith, not a culture, not an ethnicity – but an individual person.”

Perhaps the second most predictable thing about the attack is that no-one in the mainstream media will ask who let the terrorist into the country to begin with. No mainstream journalist will track down who approved his visa. No-one will ask why a person like this was allowed into the country in the first place. VJM Publishing already figured out who opened the gates – it was our 53rd Minister of Immigration, National’s Jonathan Coleman.

As for why a New Zealand Minister of Immigration would open the doors to a terrorist, the answer depends on how much conspiracy theory you can handle.

The first thing to establish is that the supermarket attack was not an isolated incident. Since 2014, Muslims have carried out over a hundred terror attacks in Europe, with almost 400 total deaths. This is nothing unusual – it’s merely a hundred more examples of the now well-established 1400-year pattern of Muslims slaughtering anyone foolish enough to let them in.

Although the mainstream media will act like the motivations for the supermarket attack are mysterious, they’re actually very simple. The terrorist was an Islamic supremacist who believed that we Kiwis are filthy kuffirs who ought to submit to Islam or be destroyed. He was motivated by the idea that he was fighting a holy war against the enemies of the God of Abraham.

His intention – as with all who think like him – was to keep stabbing us, and shooting us, and raping our women and children, until one of two things happen: either we convert to Islam, or we disappear.

Ardern claimed that the terror attack “was carried out by an individual, not a faith, not a culture, not an ethnicity, but an individual person who was gripped by ideology that is not supported here by anyone or any community.” The reality is that plenty of Muslims support ISIS and the general ideology of Islamic supremacism. The Muslim community is the grass in which snakes like yesterday’s terrorist hide.

A Pew opinion poll found that “support in some degree for suicide bombings among younger European Muslims ranged from 22 percent in Germany to 29 percent in Spain, 35 percent in Britain and 42 percent in France.” A BBC poll in Britain found that a quarter of British Muslims sympathise with the Charlie Hebdo terrorists of 2015. Things are so bad that it’s more common today for British Muslims to join ISIS than to join the British Army.

What Kiwis have utterly failed to understand is that Muslims view the Muslim conquest of the world in much the same way that Kiwis view the All Blacks winning the Rugby World Cup: as the best possible thing that could happen. Last night’s terror attack was, for them, like watching the All Blacks scoring a try is for us. It was a victory for their team (the believers) against the opposition team (the infidels).

The Islamic State will happily admit to what is written in the paragraph above. Anyone doubting this needs to read Issue 15 of Dabiq magazine, the English-language magazine published by ISIS to explain their intentions and aspirations. One article in Issue 15 of Dabiq is titled ‘Why We Hate You & Why We Fight You‘. Here it is openly admitted that “We hate you, first and foremost, because you are disbelievers; you reject the oneness of Allah…”

There are believed to be some 60,000 Muslims in New Zealand. We know from the polling mentioned above that at least a quarter of Muslims living in other Western countries are ISIS sympathisers. If a similar proportion of them are ISIS sympathisers in New Zealand, that works out to be around 15,000 people.

Can you handle the idea that there are 15,000 people currently resident in New Zealand who consider yesterday’s mass stabbing to have been a good thing that increased the glory of Islam? That’s the reality that we now have to face. We’ve opened that door.

The grim, blood-stained reality is: now that we’ve opened our borders to Islam, and allowed it to gain a foothold here, the terror attacks will never end. We know this because the established modus operandi of Muslims in every area in which they gain a foothold is the same: to terrorise the locals until they submit to Islam. To never allow them a moment of peace otherwise.

Attacks like last night’s, and a hundred times worse, have been happening in Europe for decades. In Britain, 19,000 girls are raped every year by Muslim grooming gangs. New Zealand already has the refugee that won’t stop offending. Why open the borders any further to this menace?

The correct response to the supermarket attack is twofold.

First, a complete and total stop to all Muslim immigration to New Zealand. This means a total stop to all entry into New Zealand of Muslims from other countries. No refugees, no students, no family reunification, no work visas. Only apostates and women (i.e. victims of Islam) will be allowed into New Zealand from Muslim countries.

Second, everyone who supported or facilitated mass Muslim immigration to New Zealand has to be removed from public office, and barred from ever holding public office in the future. These people have demonstrated such a degree of poor judgment that they’re indistinguishable from traitors. They’ve opened the door of Hell to New Zealand, and people like them have to be discouraged from doing so again in the future.

If you would like to support our work in other ways, please consider subscribing to our SubscribeStar fund. Even better, buy any one of our books!

It’s Time For A Global ‘Lying Flat’ Movement

A wave of young people in China, driven to exhaustion by the relentless demands of their industrial culture, have launched what they call the ‘Lying flat’ movement. They protest their workplace pressures by doing the absolute minimum amount of work possible. This essay will suggest that it’s time to bring the lying flat movement to the world stage.

The lying flat movement is inspired by the idea that a chive lying flat cannot be reaped. In this context, to lie flat is to refuse to be exploited, to disengage from the rat race. The usual path involves moving to the countryside and living as cheaply as possible. Someone lying flat might still work, but they’ll do it for themselves or their family or village instead of some corporate.

The lying flat movement began in China as a reaction to their onerous 996 culture, which insists on a 9am to 9pm, six day workweek. These 72-hour workweeks are incredibly profitable for those who own and run the factories and offices, but, for those supplying the labour component, they’re brutal.

Such long hours are tough even when well-remunerated. A 72-hour workweek leaves very little time or energy left over for recreation. It’s an extreme grind, and will drive a worker to exhaustion in short order.

Unfortunately, the post-nationalist capitalist mentality is that workers are just replaceable parts, and if one breaks down it’s a simple matter of chucking it out and replacing it with a new one. The Chinese industrialists, like the Western industrialists, import outside cheap labour to replace the native labour that they drive into the ground, only theirs comes from rural China instead of everywhere in the world.

The net result is the same, however. An oversupply of labour can only lead to one thing, and that’s a discounted labour price, which itself leads to the impoverishment of the working class. The mass importation of cheap labour has such a destructive effect on native wages that the inevitable end result is a shit life for everyone except for the employers of that cheap labour.

The Chinese have figured out that there’s no winning for workers under these conditions – so why don’t we?

Why don’t we take the lying flat movement to the whole world?

A global lying flat movement would firstly recruit the already rapidly-growing legions of NEETs in the West, and the hikikomoris in Japan. These groups have already dropped out of the industrial profit machine, and are essentially part of a global lying flat movement already. They were the first to realise that the equation of how much was being asked of them to how much they were rewarded did not add up, and their example can inspire others.

The movement would next recruit anyone who works full-time but can’t buy a home or raise a family on their wage. The individuals in this group have not yet suffered psychological collapse, unlike those in the first group, and are still able to labour. However, the equation doesn’t add up for them either. The difference is that this second group is now close to 50% of the working-age population, and higher in the younger demographics.

Before either group can be recruited, a canon of high-quality propaganda must be developed. This propaganda must suggest persuasively that industrialised hyper-capitalist society is in fact evil, and that refusing to power it with one’s life energy is a moral imperative. One example of such propaganda argues that a life on welfare is morally superior to a life as a worker, because the welfare beneficiary uses fewer resources, and resource conservation is now more important than production.

This propaganda will be effective because many who hear it will already be receptive to it. Many are already tempted to drop out of the system, having long ago calculated that their wages will never allow them to save enough to own their own home and raise a family. If they see that other people achieve a higher standard of living by dropping out of the system, they’ll become motivated to drop out as well.

That people will drop out of the system is inevitable at this stage of the cycle. Working hard in the city only makes sense during the boom times, because in the boom times the workers have the leverage, and so they can get a fair share of their own productivity. But capital always outpaces labour (link goes to .pdf), so when the bust part of the cycle hits, the people who own everything will maintain their share by reducing the share of the workers.

If you’re a worker and not an owner, then, you want to be living cheaply in the countryside when the bust hits. This is what great numbers of young Chinese have already figured out. It’s harder to do in New Zealand, because we don’t have villages everywhere, but it’s still possible. The basic leverage equation makes city life less and less worthwhile with every year that passes.

A global return to cheap, low-stress country living would cripple the industrial capital juggernaut, and shift the balance of wage negotiation leverage back towards the worker. Starved of cheap labour, the ruling class would be forced to pay a fair wage or go without producers. It’s time to go tang ping, and bring the lying flat movement to every corner of the industrialised world.

If you would like to support our work in other ways, please consider subscribing to our SubscribeStar fund. Even better, buy any one of our books!