Why People Are Helping Tom Phillips Hide From The Police

When I was younger, I had a family member in the trade of supplying medicinal cannabis to people with various conditions, including Huntington’s disease. One day the New Zealand Police caught wind of his operation, so they came to his house, arrested him, and chucked him in a cage with rapists and murderers for nine months.

He came out damaged – not physically, but with a transparent case of C-PTSD. Evidently the nine months of constant physical threat caused serious trauma and brain damage. He came out paranoid, aggressive, bullying, abusive and impulsive, seeing threats and dangers everywhere. Another casualty of the War on Drugs.

Shortly afterwards (in 1990), I was watching the television news with some of my family when there was a report about a Police officer who had died falling from a helicopter sling during a cannabis recovery operation. Upon hearing this, my family cheered. Comments about how the only good pig was a dead one were made. A dead Police officer was a dead enemy.

Our family suffered greatly from the law against cannabis, and we are far from the only ones. This century alone, tens of thousands of Kiwi families have been destroyed by cannabis prohibition – destroyed by New Zealand Police officers who mindlessly enforced a cruel and unjust law written by scum politicians.

The net result is that everyone in my family – like tens of thousands of others – hates the Police. We don’t see them as heroes keeping the community safe, but rather as the footsoldiers of tyrannical filth – no different to the enforcers of every other despot.

Upon hearing such things, most mainstream Kiwis react with denial. My family must just be really fucked up, most people conclude. But mainstream Kiwis, secluded from the underbelly of society, don’t understand that there is a large segment of the New Zealand population who hate the Police and consider them the enemy of anyone who wants to live freely in peace.

Many such Kiwis are wondering how “fugitive” Tom Phillips has managed to evade the New Zealand Police for so long. The part of New Zealand in which Phillips is hiding is not so big, the Police have surveillance capacities that most of us couldn’t dream of, and Phillips has been featured on television several times. Why haven’t they got him yet?

Based on the fact that my own family has harboured people on the run from the law, I can make a good guess. In all likelihood, Phillips has an entire community of people looking out for him. They know that the Police are looking for Phillips – and that makes him the good guy, the same way that Sauron hunting for Frodo made Frodo the good guy.

Because law enforcement has always eagerly served tyrants, there have always been communities that served as Underground Railroads, helping to keep the victims of oppression free from “justice”. In principle, there is little fundamental difference between an Underground Railroad hiding escaped slaves from the authorities, and a hypothetical community of social outsiders hiding other people falsely accused of being criminals, whether political dissidents, spiritual sacrament users or Tom Phillips.

I can all but guarantee that there are at least a hundred people who know where Tom Phillips is, and they’re all keeping quiet because they hate the Police, knowing them to be agents of tyranny. Almost certainly those hundred personally know victims of previous human rights abuses carried out by New Zealand law enforcement. These people feel that by defying the Police, who are evil, they are doing good.

Understanding why Tom Phillips has so many supporters is a matter of understanding why the New Zealand political establishment has so many enemies. And this has a simple explanation: the New Zealand political establishment is evil, and has a history of causing suffering to innocent people without moral justification.

There is only one possible solution to this dilemma.

It’s not to reform the Police. The Police will always be the same: unthinking dogs obeying their masters. They’re incapable of being anything else. In practice, the Police are a tool, like an automatic rifle. Used wisely, they’re capable of preventing great harm. Used unwisely, they’re capable of inflicting great harm.

Therefore, our solution is to reform the political class, so that they do the right thing, and do not direct the Police to cause harm. All victimless crimes must be abolished. Those who made crimes out of victimless actions have to be punished. Those who waged the War on Drugs on the New Zealand people have to be tried with treason.

If we want the New Zealand Police to operate in harmony with the population they’re policing, and not as an America-style cudgel of the state with which the population are beaten into submission, then we need a new policing philosophy. Perhaps one in which individual Police officers were empowered to – or perhaps even obliged to – disobey unjust laws. This may be impossible without a New Zealand Constitution.

*

For more of VJM’s ideas, see his work on other platforms! https://linktr.ee/vjmpublishing
For even more of VJM’s ideas, buy one of his books! https://www.amazon.com/author/vincemcleod

*

If you enjoyed reading this essay/article, you can get a compilation of the Best VJMP Essays and Articles from 2021 from Amazon as a Kindle ebook or paperback. Compilations of the Best VJMP Essays and Articles of 2020, the Best VJMP Essays and Articles of 2019, the Best VJMP Essays and Articles of 2018 and the Best VJMP Essays and Articles of 2017 are also available.

*

If you would like to support our work in other ways, subscribe to our SubscribeStar fund, or make a donation to our Paypal! Even better, buy any one of our books!

What Would Be A Fair Wage Today, In Housing Terms?

A recent post on Plebbit’s r/newzealand subforum involved a Boomer crying about having to pay a farmhand $28 per hour. The Boomer seemed surprised that “a young guy in his late twenties” wasn’t grateful for the opportunity. Simple economic psychology explains why – and everyone younger than Boomers understands it.

If said farmhand works 40 hours a week for 50 weeks a year, he’ll earn a gross pay of $56,000. After income tax, that works out to $45,323. After rent is sucked out of him, he’s left with the princely sum of $37,003. Let’s say that he’s capable of living as cheaply as the average beneficiary, on about $350 per week or so. That leaves him with $18,803 in savings per year to go towards owning a house one day.

The average New Zealand house price is now $893,639. This means it would take our farmhand 47.53 years to save up enough money. Assuming he’s now 29, he should have enough money by roughly age 77. And this is assuming that house prices don’t rise in this time.

The obvious objection here is that our farmhand would get a mortgage. So let’s do the maths on that.

The WestPac mortgage calculator suggests that a person on a wage of $56,000 p.a. should be able to afford a mortgage of $249,360. If they already had a 20% deposit saved, they could potentially buy a house worth $311,700.

A TradeMe Property search reveals that there is almost nowhere that you can buy a house in New Zealand for $311,700. For reference, even leasehold land in Hokitika, a town more remote than 99% of New Zealand, is going for $249,000 right now. Almost everything else at that price is a bare section.

So with a 30-year mortgage, our farmhand could potentially aim to own enough land to pitch a tent on by the time he was 60. Finding a fertile woman as a 60-year old man living in a tent would no doubt prove an absurd challenge.

Buying an actual home is simply impossible on $28/hour. Homeownership and raising a family are unachievable dreams on such a wage. Ergo, it isn’t a fair wage, it’s exploitation. Which raises an obvious question: what would be a fair wage for a full-time worker today?

The first assumption is that the most accurate measure of a fair wage is the extent to which it provides for a decent (not luxurious) lifestyle, and this primarily means homeownership. People are not happy making high wages if all they can afford is televisions and takeaways and the money doesn’t stretch to establishing a home.

The second assumption is that the Boomers themselves got a fair deal. Thus, I will assume that the housing situation in 1992 (when the average Boomer would have been about 36-37) is representative of the Boomer life experience. This certainly meant homeownership; for many Boomers, it meant owning so many homes that they could live off the rents of the young for life.

In 1992 the average New Zealand house price was $109,000. Also in 1992, the average hourly wage was about $15. This works out to 7,266 hours of saved labour to own the average house.

If the average house price now is $893,639, we can divide that by 7,266 hours of labour, and then multiply the resulting hourly wage by 2,000 hours in the year, to find the annual wage that would give a late-20s farmhand today the same chance of owning a home that a late-20s Boomer had in 1992 (this is the youngest possible Boomer, and all older ones will have had an even easier time).

Therefore, a fair wage today, per annum, would be about $245,978. Only a wage of no less than $245,978 would allow today’s worker to own a home with the same ease that the Boomers enjoyed. Any less than that, and today’s worker is forced to work hours that Boomers were not forced to, in order to enjoy the same standard of living.

Note that this figure implies absolutely zero standard of living increase from all the technological advancement of the last 31 years. Let’s just assume (for the sake of humility, perhaps) that the corporates deserve all of the profits from all of that advancement, which includes the advent of the personal computer, the Internet, the cellphone etc. Let’s assume that our farmhand deserves a zero share of this bounty.

That still leaves us with a wage of $245,978 (some $123 per hour) minimum for today’s farmhand to have the same standard of living as a farmhand in 1992. Such a wage is necessary if he wants to buy today’s $893,639 average house with 7,266 hours of saved labour, as the average Boomer was privileged enough to do.

Of course, the average farmer or business owner would rather go out of business than pay a wage anywhere near that. Which leaves many people asking honestly where the New Zealand economy can possibly go from here.

*

For more of VJM’s ideas, see his work on other platforms! https://linktr.ee/vjmpublishing
For even more of VJM’s ideas, buy one of his books! https://www.amazon.com/author/vincemcleod

*

If you enjoyed reading this essay/article, you can get a compilation of the Best VJMP Essays and Articles from 2021 from Amazon as a Kindle ebook or paperback. Compilations of the Best VJMP Essays and Articles of 2020, the Best VJMP Essays and Articles of 2019, the Best VJMP Essays and Articles of 2018 and the Best VJMP Essays and Articles of 2017 are also available.

*

If you would like to support our work in other ways, subscribe to our SubscribeStar fund, or make a donation to our Paypal! Even better, buy any one of our books!

Charlie Mitchell: Mainstream Media Maggot

Imagine making a living finding justifications to silence freethinkers. This is what mainstream media scumbag Charlie Mitchell does, as evidenced by his recent efforts to have VJM cancelled from Reality Check Radio.

According to Mitchell the Maggot, if you have “offensive” opinions you need to be silenced.

When I was a child, journalists were the good guys who platformed people who the control system wanted silenced. Now journalists deplatform people on behalf of the control system. Mainstream journalists really are maggots.

Correlations With Special Voting Yes In The Euthanasia Referendum

VariableSpecial voting Yes for Euthanasia
Honours degree0.750
Master’s degree0.746
Working in professional, scientific or technical services0.743
Special voting Yes for cannabis0.742
Working as a professional0.700
Voting Greens 20200.697
Bachelor’s degree0.687
Personal income $70,000+0.685
No children0.663
Mean personal income0.654
Working in information media or telecommunications0.623
Following Judaism0.617
Doctorate0.613
Voting The Opportunities Party 20200.602
Working in financial or insurance services0.558
Median personal income0.553
Working in arts or recreation services0.544
Part-time study0.499
Aged 25-290.499
Working in rental, hiring or real estate services0.485
Voting Sustainable NZ 20200.469
Receiving income from interest, dividends, rent, other investments0.462
Aged 30-340.435
Aged 20-240.433
Percentage of electorate overseas-born0.397
Receiving income from self-employment or owning one’s own business0.390
Turnout rate0.366
Following Buddhism0.364
Employed full-time0.349
Own house in family trust0.338
Working in accommodation or food services0.314
Aged 35-390.309
Receiving income from Student Allowance0.298
Asian0.279
Working as a manager0.277
Receiving wage or salary0.275
Following no religion0.274
Aged 40-440.234
Never married0.234
Level 6 diploma0.232
Enrolled in an urban electorate0.220
Aged 45-490.205
Working in public administration or safety0.198
Employed part-time0.194
Voting ACT 20200.174
Voting National 20200.168
Following Hinduism0.165
Personal income $5,000-$10,0000.143
Following Spiritualism or a New Age religion0.136
Enrolled in a North Island electorate0.135
Voting TEA Party 20200.129
European0.125
Personal income $50,000-$70,0000.115
Neither ownership of house nor house in family trust0.113
Working as a clerical or administrative worker0.109
Currently unpartnered0.108
Working in education or training0.094
Following Islam0.086
Level 3 certificate0.070
Aged 50-540.069
Personal income < $5,0000.030
Percentage of voting age population enrolled0.025
Percentage of males in electorate0.019
Full-time study0.013
Working in wholesale trade0.004
One child0.000
Working as a sales worker-0.005
Working in administrative or support services-0.009
Voting Heartland NZ 2020-0.015
Percentage of females in electorate-0.019
Receiving no source of income-0.058
Not studying-0.061
Aged 85+-0.083
Voting Labour 2020-0.092
Aged 55-59-0.103
Married (not separated)-0.107
Currently partnered-0.108
Aged 70-74-0.118
Two children-0.123
Aged 65-69-0.132
Aged 75-79-0.149
Aged 60-64-0.149
Mean age-0.155
Voting NZ Outdoors Party 2020-0.160
Working in mining-0.166
Aged 80-84-0.178
Working in healthcare or social assistance-0.184
Unemployed-0.195
Receiving income from NZ Super or Veteran’s pension-0.210
Voting New Conservative 2020-0.212
Voting Social Credit 2020-0.214
Working in construction-0.214
Voting Maori Party 2020-0.215
Enrolled in a Maori electorate-0.217
Pacific Islander-0.221
Median age-0.221
Voting Vision NZ Party 2020-0.233
Working as a community or personal services worker-0.236
Working in electricity, gas, water or waste services-0.243
Working in retail trade-0.253
Working in other services-0.270
Own or part own house-0.273
Voting New Zealand First 2020-0.275
Voting ONE Party 2020-0.298
Voting Advance NZ 2020-0.308
Voting ALCP 2020-0.312
Following a Maori religion-0.315
Maori-0.322
Receiving income from Supported Living Payment-0.354
Working in agriculture, forestry or fishing-0.367
Receiving income from Sole Parent Support-0.373
Following Christianity-0.394
Not in the labour force-0.394
Percentage of electorate New Zealand-born-0.397
Receiving income from Jobseeker Support-0.398
Divorced/separated/widowed-0.414
Working in transport, postal or warehousing-0.424
Working as a technician or trades worker-0.437
Three children-0.493
Receiving income from ACC or private work insurance-0.521
Personal income $20,000-$30,000-0.527
Personal income $10,000-$20,000-0.537
Level 5 diploma-0.541
Six or more children-0.555
Object to answering how many children-0.561
Level 2 certificate-0.572
Level 1 certificate-0.587
Personal income $30,000-$50,000-0.597
Level 4 certificate-0.597
Working as a machinery operator or driver-0.617
Working as a labourer-0.635
Five children-0.647
Working in manufacturing-0.655
Four children-0.667
No NZQA qualifications-0.727

*

This table is an excerpt from the upcoming 3rd Edition of Understanding New Zealand, by Dan McGlashan and published by VJM Publishing. Understanding New Zealand is the comprehensive guide to the demographics and voting patterns of the New Zealand people.