1. The Third Tenet reminds us that the Great Fractal is the eternal and infinite interplay of the war between good and evil and the dance between masculine and feminine.
2. When two sides exchange in the belief that the other is evil, one has war.
3. When two sides exchange in the belief that the other is good, one has peace.
4. War is when good and evil exchange.
5. Peace is when masculine and feminine exchange.
6. The absence of exchange does not connotate peace, but an excess of order. Because an excess of order does not entertain the gods, they tend to cause it to dissolve in warfare.
7. War is not an inherent evil, but rather an intensification of the experience of passing through the Great Fractal.
8. Peace is not an inherent good, but rather a relaxation of the experience of passing through the Great Fractal.
9. While at war, one can be certain that the gods are watching.
10. While at festival, one can also be certain that the gods are watching.
11. It is false that peace does not entertain the gods, but they prefer festivals to stagnant peace.
12. The gods are appalled by those who live in peace but fail to appreciate it. They bring war upon such ungrateful types.
13. If one can learn to overcome the suffering of war, then one is likely to entertain the gods.
14. If one can learn to appreciate the suffering of war, then one is certain to entertain the gods.
15. War is the natural order of material life, therefore those who overcome it entertain the gods.
16. Peace inherently entertains the gods by virtue of being unusual. A stagnating peace, however, causes them to will chaos upon the stagnant.
17. Without awareness of the Four Tenets, there exists only war.
18. Understanding the First Tenet means having compassion for all living beings.
19. Understanding the Fourth Tenet means that one’s fragment of consciousness radiates peace into the material world.
20. The Elementalist is not prejudiced, neither for or against, either war or peace. The most important thing is to play one’s role in entertaining the gods.
21. War and peace span a spectrum of intensity that is akin to the spectrum spanned by fire and earth. The most intense warfare can be compared to the hottest fire.
*
This chapter is an excerpt from Elemental Elementalism, the foundational scripture of the new religion of the Age of Aquarius.
I understand that the ruling elites of my country want war with you. This is apparent not only from the strategic situation but from the propaganda those elites are pushing on us, the citizens of the West. This propaganda is intended to stir us up into a war frenzy, a killing frenzy, which those ruling elites then intend to direct at their rivals in China. This letter is therefore my promise to you.
When I say “ruling elites of my country” I also mean the ruling elites of the world, because they are the same people. I’m referring to the international banking and finance interests, primarily Anglo-American, who took control of the world after defeating their national socialist and international socialist oppositions in World War II and the Cold War.
These banking and finance interests, thanks to their control of the mainstream media, have total control of the minds of Westerners. Everything we think is what they tell us to think. Everything we value is what they tell us to value. If they tell us that China is a threat to the world and we need to destroy it, we will howl for your destruction. But I will not.
The last time there was a real threat to the control of the world by Anglo-American banking and finance interests, in the form of national socialist Germany, those banking and finance interests instigated war. They were happy to conscript working-class men from my country, send them to the other side of the world, and force them to kill working-class men from Germany.
They do the same even when there isn’t a real threat, such as with Saddam Hussein’s Iraq or Moammar Gaddafi’s Libya. Both nations were destroyed because they refused to submit to the global order. The destruction of these nations were two of the worst crimes committed this century, but the perpetrators of them will suffer no penalty, because they were acting on the orders of the same international banking and finance interests who control the application of justice.
China today practices the same nationalist socialism that was practiced by Germany and Libya. As with Germany and Libya, freedom from international parasites has unleashed a wave of creativity and generated immense wealth. Everyone knows that China, on its current trajectory, will soon surpass the West on many important measures of power. This brings with it a sharply increased likelihood of conflict.
The same moneylenders who goaded the Anglosphere into war against Libya, Iraq, Afghanistan, Vietnam, Germany and others – and always based on lies – are about to start goading us into war against you. It’s already clear that the apparatus of propaganda is conditioning us to consent to a war against you. They want us manning the missile launchers and the aircraft carriers, waiting for them give the signal.
This letter is to confirm that I will never, ever take part in military action against you.
I do not say this because I am a coward – I have seen people die and have made peace with the fact that my physical body will also die one day. Neither do I say this because I am a traitor – my nation is a natural extension of my clan and family and therefore an extension of myself, and so my goodwill lies with it. My motivations are spiritual. I am concerned with behaving in accordance with the will of the divine.
Not only am I willing to promise that I will never take up arms against you on the lies of globalists, I am willing to go one step further.
I promise that if a conscription officer should come to my house to tell me that I have to kill you, I will instead kill that conscription officer on the spot. It doesn’t matter how. I will push him down the stairs, bronco stomp his ribcage in, smash his brains out with a brick. I will do this in full knowledge of the fact that I will be executed for it. Then I will cut his head off and put it on YouTube, explaining my actions.
The explanation: better to die than to be used as a tool for evil!
I cannot promise that I can succeed in influencing the course of events, because our enemy has an entire media apparatus in service of their aims, and this apparatus demonises men like me, smearing us as insane and dangerous. My people would kill me if the television told them to, and just as readily as they would kill you. However, this I can promise: the truth has at least one friend in New Zealand.
1. Many ask how a God who created this world full of horrors could be anything other than evil.
2. It seems that we are born just to suffer, grow old, get sick and die. One comes to consciousness just to observe one’s body disintegrate in agony.
3. Such thoughts lead to colossal suffering for an enormous number of people.
4. The Elementalist does not suffer from such thoughts. Understanding the Tenets, the Elementalist is free from spiritual suffering.
5. The First, Second and Third Tenets remind us that consciousness is the prima materia, and the material world – in which all suffering occurs – just an illusion.
6. The Fourth Tenet reminds us that the natural state of consciousness is one of perfect bliss – and thus, perfect boredom.
7. As such, all suffering has been dreamed up by the divine for the sole purpose of entertaining itself.
8. The Elementalist understands that the Great Fractal is akin to an unsleeping slaughterhouse, in which living creatures, in competition for scarce resources, battle each other to the death before they starve.
9. That life on Earth is a neverending slaughterfest is not, by itself, cause to succumb to horror.
10. The Elementalist says “Let it be worse! Let me be torn to pieces by wolves! If my suffering should entertain the gods, it is my will!”
11. Suffering is inherent to life so that one can entertain the gods by overcoming it.
12. The greater the intensity of the suffering, the greater the opportunity to entertain the gods.
13. The gods are most entertained by that which overcomes the most extreme suffering.
14. Although the greatest good is to entertain the gods, there are several other positives to the inherent horror of life.
15. The foremost of these: the great suffering caused by the horror of this world affords us great potential to alter our frequencies of consciousness.
16. That immense suffering is inherent to life gives us unlimited opportunity to say No to suffering.
17. Every instance of suffering is an opportunity to increase the frequency of one’s consciousness.
18. This world may be one of the Hell Realms, as suggested by the fact that we are bound to die. This makes all of us a kind of spiritual pentitent.
19. The intensity of the suffering in this Hell Realm affords a greater opportunity to alter the frequencies of our consciousness than if we had incarnated into a more pleasant part of the Great Fractal.
20. Like elemental fire, the inherent horror of this world offers great potential to control one’s destiny.
*
This chapter is an excerpt from Elemental Elementalism, the foundational scripture of the new religion of the Age of Aquarius.
After both the Utoya massacre and the Christchurch mosque massacre, the mainstream media rushed to explain both deeds as white supremacist terror. But in their haste to push the narrative that Anders Breivik and Brenton Tarrant were neo-Nazis, the opinion-shapers (deliberately or otherwise) only misdirected people from an understanding of the true motives of the killers. The reality is that both attacks were acts of Christian terror.
Breivik didn’t even try to hide the fact that he was a Christian. The cover of his manifesto prominently featured a Christian cross, and the text repeatedly emphasised his adoration for the Christian military orders that fought against Muslims in the Crusades and in actions such as the Siege of Vienna. It is apparent from reading Breivik’s manifesto that he saw himself as a knight crusader in the defence of Christendom against her enemies, one of a long line.
Tarrant was obviously inspired by Breivik. He followed closely Breivik’s methodology for carrying out a terrorist attack. Like Breivik, he also left a manifesto detailing his motivations, intentions and aspirations, in which he concedes that he took most of his inspiration from the Norwegian Freemason (and therefore Christian, as only Christians are permitted entry to the Scandinavian Rite).
Tarrant wasn’t the scholar that Breivik was, and his manifesto was much briefer and much less formal. However, Tarrant’s manifesto also made clear his Christian motivations, not least of which was a fervent desire to retake Constantinople for Christendom.
Tarrant visited Europe in 2017, and was appalled by its advanced state of social decay. One of the things that upset him the most was seeing “empty churches and full mosques” in every country. No white supremacist would care about empty churches, because they consider Christianity to be a religion for subhumans that was forced on their ancestors by violence and deceit. Only a Christian would take an empty church as a loss.
The Drottninggatan terror attack of April 2017, taking place among several other Islamist attacks in those years, triggered dark emotions in Tarrant, by his own admission. He considered these attacks to be “attacks on my faith”. This makes it clear that defending Christendom was a motivation he shared with Breivik. Those feelings might explain why Tarrant’s manifesto contains an explicit and direct appeal to Christians, referencing the Pope who launched the Crusades.
Before carrying out his attack, Tarrant claims to have asked for – and received – a blessing from a reborn version of the Knights Templar, the Christian soldiers who fought in the Crusades. His choice of target was partially motivated by the “desecration” of a church in Ashburton that had been converted into a mosque. The most telling, however, is that he rhetorically asks himself if he is a Christian, and finds himself unable to deny it.
Brenton Tarrant was a Christian, and his attack was an act of Christian terrorism.
The Christchurch mosque shootings can best be understood as the actions of a religious supremacist, one who seeks to strike a blow against a rival religion that he fears is ascendant. In this context, Tarrant was simply another Christian soldier marching on his enemies, little different to the dozens of Abrahamists who commit terror attacks every month.
The history of the Middle East, the Near East and Europe is replete with Christian vs. Muslim struggles. Ever since Islam was founded 1,400 years ago, the Middle East has been a battlefield for an intra-Abrahamic civil war that has claimed the lives of hundreds of millions. This war has periodically raged through the Near East and into Europe, leading to the threat of Muslim control of Europe on at least two occasions.
Breivik was aware of the Battle of Tours and of the Siege of Vienna, so he was aware of how close Muslims have come to conquering Europe in the past. The mass Muslim immigration to Europe of recent decades must have seemed to him like another conquest attempt. No doubt it fed into the persecution mania that he shared with Christians in general.
Breivik conceived of his action in the context of Islamic expansion into Christian territory. Norwegian socialists were holding the borders open for Islamic invaders in the same way that the Jews of Toledo had done for the Saracen invaders. They were therefore responsible for the loss of Christian territory and influence.
Tarrant followed a similar logic. The only major difference is that, instead of shooting up a Green or Labour Party gathering, Tarrant targeted Muslims directly. It seems that he could quite easily have chosen a Green or Labour Party gathering with little change of mindset. The only major difference, if he had done so, would be less appeal for the white supremacist narrative.
In reality, a white supremacist has no reason to target Muslims any more than to target Christians. White supremacist rage is usually directed at those who let the invaders in, on the principle that traitors should be dealt with before enemies. Examples of the usual white supremacist modus operandi are the assassination of Jo Cox in 2016 and the assassination of Walter Luebcke in 2019, both targets being pro-refugee globalist politicians.
A Christian, on the other hand, has plenty of justification to target Muslims. Like Muslims, Christians believe that Yahweh has commanded the whole world to submit to their cult, and therefore any action taken to induce that submission is divine will. Christians have murdered non-Christians everywhere the two have met – that one might do so in New Zealand would be nothing out of the ordinary.
Muslims want everyone in the world to be Muslim; Christians want everyone in the world to be Christian. It’s inevitable that two ideologies of that level of arrogance will clash. The motivations of Anders Breivik and Brenton Tarrant are not easily understood in this age of pacified, infantilised and stupefied media consoomers. But their motivations were Christian, and shared with two millennia of Christian murderers before them.
