Is Professor Jiang At Risk Of Assassination?

The hottest property on the Internet right now is Chinese history professor Jiang Xueqin. Prof. Jiang’s blend of meticulous research, epic range, humour and eccentricity – but with a Western presentation – has people all around the world waiting for the next video drop. His Predictive History channel on YouTube is, at time of writing, closing in on a million subscribers. But the phenomenon might be too good to last.

Prof. Jiang comes across as a Chinese version of David Icke. Like the Brit, Jiang’s research is so thorough that he can talk for hours in incredible detail. His Secret History lecture series covers many of the same topics as Icke: Freemasonic conspiracies, Khazar conversion theories, Rothschild Zionists, globalist banking dynasties and more. Like Icke, Jiang weaves all of these disparate strands into a coherent, anti-Establishment worldview. This makes him dangerous.

David Icke is banned from over 30 countries, including the entire Schengen Zone. The purported reason is that Icke is a “potential threat to public order”. The actual reason is that he tells the truth about the government.

Although Icke is frequently smeared as a racist, this is simply absurd, because he makes a point of emphasising that all of us are a fragment of God consciousness underneath the skinsuit, and therefore that all racial divisions are fundamentally arbitrary and meaningless. I would, in fact, argue that Icke is less racist than 90% of people in general and 99% of his audience. The racist and Nazi accusations are only distractions from the truth, which is that Icke has seen through the lies of the ruling class.

Prof. Jiang has also seen through the lies of the ruling class, particularly the political, religious and spiritual ones. He openly states that Jews invented Christianity to enslave Europe, and that the Western ruling class run Israel as a colonial project. We’re supposed to believe that antisemitism is an entirely organic phenomenon caused by the inability of whites to control their inherent racism, but Prof. Jiang explains that it’s artificially stoked by the ruling class to get Jews to move to Israel. He also speaks freely about the prevalence of pedophiles in the higher echelons of Western society, and explains that this is about mutual blackmail.

In other words, Prof. Jiang is giving a way a lot of the plan – the plan that was supposed to be secret.

On his Substack, Jiang writes of the importance of reconnecting with the Monad (i.e. the true God). We have argued previously that genuine spirituality is the most subversive activity possible and the one thing the control system fears the most. Jiang has spoken openly about how people who truly know God – and who therefore know that they will survive the death of their physical bodies – terrify the political establishment, because these people can’t be manipulated into submission with threats of eternal hellfire or bodily torture.

This is tantamount to going onto a slave plantation and telling the slaves they can be free and leave.

Anyone speaking such hardcore truth is the foremost danger to the political establishment, who otherwise have everything locked down and squared away. Much like plantation owners, the Western ruling class don’t want their slaves getting ideas about liberation, especially spiritual liberation. This ruling class wants people pinned by the Clown World Fork of mindless Christianity or soulless atheism. Truthspeakers like Jiang are enemy number one.

Prof. Jiang’s rise has been so rapid that many are not yet aware of him. Thus, he has no established reputation as an antisemite, conspiracy theorist, terrorist or any of the other labels commonly used to silence people. This might change. It’s easy to predict that Jiang’s rising following will attract the attention of the Western ruling class, and that they will take measures to destroy him out of fear that he will wake too many people up.

David Icke can be banned from travelling, and his reputation can be trashed by the mainstream media. If the Western ruling class ban Prof. Jiang from travelling to/in the West, he probably won’t care, because he lives in China anyway, and can communicate with the world through YouTube. Likewise character assassination: the Sinosphere has its own media, so if Jiang is smeared in The Daily Mail it will reach few Chinese people.

This makes actual physical assassination look like a relatively appealing option. Socrates was killed for speaking too much truth, and so were Julius Caesar, Giordano Bruno and countless others. Western powers could easily arrange a hit on Jiang to shut him up and to send a message to anyone else thinking about giving too much of the gameplan away.

The Western ruling class assassinating a podcaster might sound outlandish, but a further possibility is that Jiang is disappeared by the CCP. Anyone who has studied history knows that tyrants like to murder their critics, and the governments of the world at the end of 2025 are becoming more tyrannical with every passing month.

For more of VJM’s ideas, see his work on other platforms!
For even more of VJM’s ideas, buy one of his books!

If you enjoyed reading this piece, buy a compilation of our best pieces from previous years!

Best VJMP Essays and Articles of 2023
Best VJMP Essays and Articles of 2022
Best VJMP Essays and Articles of 2021
Best VJMP Essays and Articles of 2020
Best VJMP Essays and Articles of 2019
Best VJMP Essays and Articles of 2018
Best VJMP Essays and Articles of 2017

If you would like to support our work in other ways, make a donation to our Paypal! Even better, buy any one of our books!

Undiagnosed Schizophrenia

Schizophrenia is one of the most devastating mental conditions in existence. The term means “split mind” and refers to a condition in which the patient – or a large part of the patient – appears to be working against themselves. It’s a terrifying condition for both sufferers and their friends and family. This essay argues there’s a lot more of it in existence than most people realise.

In the same way that physical trauma from a knife or axe can cause a person’s body to split, psychological trauma from abuse or neglect can cause a person’s mind to split. The difference is that physical trauma is well understood, whereas psychological trauma is not.

For one thing, psychological trauma is often hidden. If a person cuts their arm open, it’s obvious to everyone that they’re injured. But if a person’s mind splits, they can often convincingly pretend to be well. Even so, the trauma exists, and if it is not treated it can manifest as all kinds of mental illness. Undiagnosed schizophrenia – schizophrenia that has not yet come to the attention of the mental health services – is one of the most common of these.

This condition is on the rise today because society is naturally traumatising. It’s naturally traumatising to work a full-time job for minimum wage, just to see most of it disappear in taxes and rents, or to live in a media environment where it’s not okay to be white, and, if you say that it is, you get a visit from the cops, or to live in a culture where spirituality is reduced to either worshipping an idol of a dead rabbi or nothing. Thus, there are a lot of people out there who are damaged.

Because society is so traumatising, and because there are so many damaged people in it, schizophrenia has come to appear more and more normal. In a vicious cycle, this leads to it getting diagnosed less. So there are a lot of people out there with split minds who are completely unaware that their minds are so split. Many of them have extremely difficult lives emotionally and socially, but are never able to figure out why.

These wretched masses are the undiagnosed schizophrenics.

The first sign of undiagnosed schizophrenia in another person is extreme moodiness. If a slight irritation causes so much rage that it feels like another personality has been brought out, chances are a split mind underlies them both. Schizophrenia and multiple personality disorder (dissociative identity disorder, or DID) are different conditions, and borderline personality disorder is different still, but they all overlap to some degree. If excessive moodiness is not part of DID or borderline personality disorder, it could be undiagnosed schizophrenia.

A deeply traumatised person will often react strongly to reminders of the trauma, even if those reminders are only subconsciously perceived. Thus, being asked to do something, even politely, can provoke a powerful anti-social reaction because it reminds the hearer of being ordered around by their parents. Such reactions are typical of undiagnosed schizophrenia.

Perhaps the most telling sign is self-contradiction. If a person claims to hold a certain moral value one moment and then deny it the next, something isn’t stitched together right in their mental fabric. This is also true if they say one thing and do another. This is especially true if a person doesn’t keep their promises, which often happens because they feel that one part of the mind made the promise and another part is being asked to keep it.

Another sign is substance abuse to deal with the suffering. As mentioned above, schizophrenia is a deeply unpleasant condition to live with. It’s common for people with the condition to use drugs in an effort to alter their emotions into something more tolerable. If someone’s natural state is so unpleasant that they need substances to cope, it’s very possible they’re an undiagnosed schizophrenia case.

The popular narrative is that people get “addicted” to drugs on account of that the drugs are inherently pleasurable. But this narrative misses the reality that some people are much more susceptible to habitual drug use, because their natural state is unhappiness. For the people who have schizophrenia, undiagnosed or otherwise, it costs enormous emotional and mental energy trying to figure out what’s going on. Without release in the form of substances, many of these people would crack.

Perhaps the most salient sign of undiagnosed schizophrenia is poor decision making. If a person consistently makes truly bad decisions, as if sabotaging themselves, there’s a very high chance they’re an undiagnosed schizophrenia case with one part of their mind working against the other. This goes double with the point above about substance abuse: if they keep sabotaging themselves with hard drugs, for no obvious reason, undiagnosed schizophrenia is very possible.

Taken together, these four signs often reveal an underlying pseudo-schizophrenic condition.

Undiagnosed schizophrenia is a vastly underestimated problem in our society. Only by taking trauma and mental health seriously can we hope to overcome it.

For more of VJM’s ideas, see his work on other platforms!
For even more of VJM’s ideas, buy one of his books!

If you enjoyed reading this piece, buy a compilation of our best pieces from previous years!

If you would like to support our work in other ways, make a donation to our Paypal! Even better, buy any one of our books!

Enclownification

The world is now familiar with the term “enshittification”. Coined by science fiction writer Cory Doctorow, it accurately describes today’s tendency towards lower quality and worse service in every facet of modern life. There’s another term we need to know to understand today’s Clown World: enclownification. This essay explains.

Enshittification is predictable: the quality of everything gets lower over time. Manufacturers of decent products start to take shortcuts in production, or substitute lower-grade materials for higher-grade ones, or they outsource customer service to a country that can’t speak English properly. The user experience is frustrating and humiliating.

Enclownification is not predictable. The quality might stay the same, but be harder to access, or be only available at certain times, or you might just get so confused by the craziness of it all that you don’t know what’s what anymore.

Enclownification is when things become absurd. Not necessarily bad, just absurd. The difference is that, with enshittification, you feel like you stepped in dogshit. With enclownification, you feel like the world is laughing at you.

A recent example: I was trying to install a printer. In attempting to make a WiFi connection, it turned out that my printer operates on one frequency GHz, and my computer another, and they were not compatible. Who knows why they were manufactured this way? Then I tried plugging in the USB cable, which allowed me to print but, for some unfathomable reason, not scan. Scanning required that I register an account with the scanning software, which was then able to detect the printer but not connect to it over USB. So ultimately I could only half use the printer.

I could imagine the customer relations department of the printer manufacturer getting inundated with complaints about this lunacy – and them having a good laugh about it rather than caring. That’s enclownification.

People frequently encounter enclownification through dealing with the Government. Anyone who has had the experience of waiting on the phone and then being randomly disconnected knows this. Likewise anyone who has called Department A, to be forwarded to Department B, to be forwarded to Department C, to be forwarded back to Department A.

The school system is perhaps more ruthlessly enclownified than any other aspect of today’s world. HONK HONK can be heard every time another Holocaust Awareness class begins. Unfortunately, the rulers of the modern West understand that manufacturing consent for their rule depends on brainwashing young people into accepting it. The best time to do this is while they’re too mentally vulnerable and soft to resist. Hence, young people are taught at school that their ruling class is the wisest, smartest and best of all ruling classes, their current standard of living the highest and their freedoms the broadest of any culture in history.

Race relations in general have been enclownified by the Brown Communist narrative that Western societies are structurally racist, and therefore that even the most wretched, broken and impoverished white person is an oppressor and riding high on inherited privilege. This has led working-class whites and working-class blacks and browns, who would otherwise have had class in common, to resent each other.

The narrative that white men are privileged, and therefore that disprivileging young white men is racial justice, is pure Clown World. Yet it endures. So many young white men have been disadvantaged by diversity, inclusion and equity practices that some call it a lost generation. The enclownification of the workplace can be seen in the difficulty that young white men have finding work today, no matter how high their education or experience levels.

Class relations have been enclownified by the above phenomena plus the severe inaffordability of housing in the modern West. This has led to a situation where anyone in line to inherit housing is doing extremely well, but anyone who isn’t is looking at a lifetime of poverty: the feudal era in all but name. Many a person will have sat down, looked at their mortgage numbers, realised that they won’t pay off their house until after they’re dead, and laughed about it, because otherwise they would have cried.

The most totally and utterly enclownified aspect of modern life, however, is spirituality. Russell Brand is the face of this phenomenon. Brand’s shamelessly performative evangelism – which began in the wake of a series of sex crime accusations – would normally convince no-one. But because widespread enclownification has affected people’s judgment, he is able to convince millions that he’s sincere.

The spiritual enclownification of today is summarised in the Clown World Fork. This concept describes how people are directed to choose between soulless, meaningless, atheistic materialism on the one hand or delusional, hypocritical, junkie-dream Christianity on the other, and strongly discouraged from exploring genuine spirituality. Anyone who does explore genuine spirituality is pathologised as a schizophrenic by the mainstream medical system (to the sound of honking).

The solution to enclownification is for things to start making sense again. Confucius spoke of beginning the process of restoring society with a “rectification of names“, a widespread movement to use language as accurately as possible. This would minimise disorientation and confusion, leading to a more harmonious society.

For more of VJM’s ideas, see his work on other platforms!
For even more of VJM’s ideas, buy one of his books!

If you enjoyed reading this piece, buy a compilation of our best pieces from previous years!

If you would like to support our work in other ways, make a donation to our Paypal! Even better, buy any one of our books!

Free Range Slavery

For most of human history, slavery has been central to all economies. Ownership of human livestock has always been the single most profitable endeavour of all, as it allows the owners to claim the productivity of the slaves. Countless wars have been fought both to capture slaves and to free them. But a number of misconceptions have arisen about the practice of slavery, both in the past and in the present.

The story we are given is that slavery has existed forever, and continued up until the British Empire banned the trade in 1807. From there it was gradually banned throughout the rest of the world. Except for one particularly violent disagreement in America in the 1860s, the world was happy to get rid of slavery, and in doing so we all moved forwards into a more equitable and respectful future. Today we are all equals, born with the same opportunities.

In reality, slavery continued, it just switched from the plantation slavery model to the free range slavery model.

In the old days, slaves were usually bound to a particular plot of land. This was because the demand for their labour initially came from landowners, who wanted someone to work their farms without payment. The origin of this practice can be seen in the behaviour of the alphas of chimpanzee troops, who control access to food and sexual resources. In the same way subordinate chimpanzees must obey the alpha or face physical violence, the slaves must obey their masters.

The landowners in such cases were often plantation owners. This is the model of slavery most common to the New World, a.k.a. the hacienda model. In the antebellum American South, slaves would often spend their entire lives on the same plantation. The problem with this model is that the slaves are obviously slaves. Therefore, they are liable to rebel.

Free range slavery is the solution to the problem of rebellion. Permit the slaves some freedom of movement, and the freedom to choose the plantation upon which they will labour, and they won’t get discontented enough to rebel. This is doubly true if you also have a gigantic propaganda apparatus brainwashing everyone into thinking they’re as free as they could ever wish to be. It’s triply true if you also have a security apparatus devoted to destroying anyone who realises any of the above.

The new ruling class of the Industrial Age were factory owners, not plantation owners. This ruling class had the insight that enclosing the commons, making it impossible for many to sustain themselves, would create a large number of desperate people willing to work for very little. Free range slavery began with the enclosure of the commons in acts such as the Highland Clearances. The people so cleared had to move to the cities and take work in factories, where they were regularly put to work for 70-80 hours per week.

In spirit, free range slavery is enslavement on the class level, something made more possible by modern technology. This technology allows for an unprecedented level of co-operation among the slave-owning classes. These ruling classes co-operate closely through two-way technology such as the telephone, while the middle and working classes are divided and conquered through one-way technology such as the television.

In the free range slavery model, each slave is free to choose the plantation on which they work. But the system is rigged so that, no matter which plantation they choose, they can never overcome slave status. No matter how high their wage, they have to pay so much in taxes, rents and other expenses that they are just as incapable of improving their position as the plantation slave.

A man who works 60 hour weeks, 250 hours/month, making $10/hour, will make about $2000/month after tax. Average rent for a one bedroom apartment is $1000/month in many American states. His bills for groceries, healthcare, electricity and other utilities will come to at least $500/month. This will leave him at most $6,000/year to put towards a house – and the average American house price is now above $370,000, so it will take him at least 60 years to get there. In practice, he will never get there, because working 60 hour weeks for 60 years is not realistic. But he will probably put in a lot of effort before he realises this.

Those who already own all the land are laughing all the way to the bank at this arrangement.

There are several advantages to the free range slavery model, which essentially maximises horizontal freedom at the same time as minimising vertical freedom.

The first, and most obvious, is that the slave owners no longer have to bother with the feeding, shelter and upkeep of the slaves. Those things are now the slaves’ problems. This is much more efficient for the slave owners, who now only have to manage the slaves during working hours. Outside of working hours, the free range slave manages itself.

A second advantage is that the free range slave can be manipulated into believing that his difficulties are his own fault. This makes him much less likely to blame the slave owners and landlords. If a free range slave can’t afford housing, he can simply be told that he isn’t working hard enough. Likewise if he can’t afford decent food. If he gets killed by rent, he can be blamed for choosing to live in a high cost-of-living area. Can’t or won’t relocate? Then he doesn’t really want freedom enough.

The main advantage to the model is that the slaves never figure out that they are slaves. If they were forced to wear shackles, or if they were whipped by overseers, they would figure it out in short order. But because they are free range slaves, any of them who complains about their conditions is met with “You can always get another job somewhere else.” Because they’re always scrambling to find or to keep employment, they never figure out that they are structurally enslaved in a way that individual action cannot overcome.

Free range slavery is, therefore, correctly understood as an ingenious system of mass enslavement with minimal resistance.

For more of VJM’s ideas, see his work on other platforms!
For even more of VJM’s ideas, buy one of his books!

If you enjoyed reading this piece, buy a compilation of our best pieces from previous years!

If you would like to support our work in other ways, make a donation to our Paypal! Even better, buy any one of our books!