1. The Quadrijitu shows us that masculine becomes feminine, feminine becomes masculine, good becomes evil and evil becomes good.
2. The shape of the Quadrijitu reflects the Hermetic Principle of Correspondence.
3. As above, so below. As below, so above. As within, so without. As without, so within. As before, so after. As after, so before. As included, so excluded. As excluded, so included.
4. Every physical action has an equal and opposite reaction.
5. Every emotional action has an equal and opposite reaction.
6. Every mental action has an equal and opposite reaction.
7. Every spiritual action has an equal and opposite reaction.
8. Suffering inures the mind to suffering; joy inures the mind to joy.
9. Verticalisation inclines the mind to see the benefits of the horizontal; horizontalisation inclines the mind to see the benefits of the vertical.
10. When the Northern Hemisphere stands in the light, the Southern Hemisphere stands in the darkness. When the Southern Hemisphere stands in the light, the Northern Hemisphere stands in the darkness.
11. When the Occident stands in the light, the Orient stands in the darkness. When the Orient stands in the light, the Occident stands in the darkness.
12. When the soul stands in the light, the body stands in the darkness. When the body stands in the light, the soul stands in the darkness.
13. Consciousness exists at the intersection between the eternal past and the eternal future. Within it, all things are possible.
14. Energy flows where attention goes. To observe something is to make it more real.
15. To pay regard to any one aspect of life is to neglect all the others. Thus, appreciating one aspect of life primes oneself to appreciate the others in turn.
16. The gods are bored by the excessively good, and wish evil upon it.
17. The sum total of all positive values and all negative values is zero.
18. The sum total of one entire rotation around the Quadrijitu is zero.
19. Bad luck affords a greater opportunity to entertain the gods, for they are most entertained by those who successfully overcome.
20. Good luck tempts fate, therefore it should be appreciated and not desired.
21. Great suffering can bring great wisdom. The purest gold can only be found after the hottest fires.
*
This chapter is an excerpt from Elemental Elementalism, the foundational scripture of the new religion of the Age of Aquarius.
After both the Utoya massacre and the Christchurch mosque massacre, the mainstream media rushed to explain both deeds as white supremacist terror. But in their haste to push the narrative that Anders Breivik and Brenton Tarrant were neo-Nazis, the opinion-shapers (deliberately or otherwise) only misdirected people from an understanding of the true motives of the killers. The reality is that both attacks were acts of Christian terror.
Breivik didn’t even try to hide the fact that he was a Christian. The cover of his manifesto prominently featured a Christian cross, and the text repeatedly emphasised his adoration for the Christian military orders that fought against Muslims in the Crusades and in actions such as the Siege of Vienna. It is apparent from reading Breivik’s manifesto that he saw himself as a knight crusader in the defence of Christendom against her enemies, one of a long line.
Tarrant was obviously inspired by Breivik. He followed closely Breivik’s methodology for carrying out a terrorist attack. Like Breivik, he also left a manifesto detailing his motivations, intentions and aspirations, in which he concedes that he took most of his inspiration from the Norwegian Freemason (and therefore Christian, as only Christians are permitted entry to the Scandinavian Rite).
Tarrant wasn’t the scholar that Breivik was, and his manifesto was much briefer and much less formal. However, Tarrant’s manifesto also made clear his Christian motivations, not least of which was a fervent desire to retake Constantinople for Christendom.
Tarrant visited Europe in 2017, and was appalled by its advanced state of social decay. One of the things that upset him the most was seeing “empty churches and full mosques” in every country. No white supremacist would care about empty churches, because they consider Christianity to be a religion for subhumans that was forced on their ancestors by violence and deceit. Only a Christian would take an empty church as a loss.
The Drottninggatan terror attack of April 2017, taking place among several other Islamist attacks in those years, triggered dark emotions in Tarrant, by his own admission. He considered these attacks to be “attacks on my faith”. This makes it clear that defending Christendom was a motivation he shared with Breivik. Those feelings might explain why Tarrant’s manifesto contains an explicit and direct appeal to Christians, referencing the Pope who launched the Crusades.
Before carrying out his attack, Tarrant claims to have asked for – and received – a blessing from a reborn version of the Knights Templar, the Christian soldiers who fought in the Crusades. His choice of target was partially motivated by the “desecration” of a church in Ashburton that had been converted into a mosque. The most telling, however, is that he rhetorically asks himself if he is a Christian, and finds himself unable to deny it.
Brenton Tarrant was a Christian, and his attack was an act of Christian terrorism.
The Christchurch mosque shootings can best be understood as the actions of a religious supremacist, one who seeks to strike a blow against a rival religion that he fears is ascendant. In this context, Tarrant was simply another Christian soldier marching on his enemies, little different to the dozens of Abrahamists who commit terror attacks every month.
The history of the Middle East, the Near East and Europe is replete with Christian vs. Muslim struggles. Ever since Islam was founded 1,400 years ago, the Middle East has been a battlefield for an intra-Abrahamic civil war that has claimed the lives of hundreds of millions. This war has periodically raged through the Near East and into Europe, leading to the threat of Muslim control of Europe on at least two occasions.
Breivik was aware of the Battle of Tours and of the Siege of Vienna, so he was aware of how close Muslims have come to conquering Europe in the past. The mass Muslim immigration to Europe of recent decades must have seemed to him like another conquest attempt. No doubt it fed into the persecution mania that he shared with Christians in general.
Breivik conceived of his action in the context of Islamic expansion into Christian territory. Norwegian socialists were holding the borders open for Islamic invaders in the same way that the Jews of Toledo had done for the Saracen invaders. They were therefore responsible for the loss of Christian territory and influence.
Tarrant followed a similar logic. The only major difference is that, instead of shooting up a Green or Labour Party gathering, Tarrant targeted Muslims directly. It seems that he could quite easily have chosen a Green or Labour Party gathering with little change of mindset. The only major difference, if he had done so, would be less appeal for the white supremacist narrative.
In reality, a white supremacist has no reason to target Muslims any more than to target Christians. White supremacist rage is usually directed at those who let the invaders in, on the principle that traitors should be dealt with before enemies. Examples of the usual white supremacist modus operandi are the assassination of Jo Cox in 2016 and the assassination of Walter Luebcke in 2019, both targets being pro-refugee globalist politicians.
A Christian, on the other hand, has plenty of justification to target Muslims. Like Muslims, Christians believe that Yahweh has commanded the whole world to submit to their cult, and therefore any action taken to induce that submission is divine will. Christians have murdered non-Christians everywhere the two have met – that one might do so in New Zealand would be nothing out of the ordinary.
Muslims want everyone in the world to be Muslim; Christians want everyone in the world to be Christian. It’s inevitable that two ideologies of that level of arrogance will clash. The motivations of Anders Breivik and Brenton Tarrant are not easily understood in this age of pacified, infantilised and stupefied media consoomers. But their motivations were Christian, and shared with two millennia of Christian murderers before them.
1. The great and the learned have long debated how life began on this planet.
2. One popular theory is that life sparked into being when lightning struck a pool of water containing the right chemicals.
3. Another popular theory is that life came to Earth from elsewhere in the galaxy, perhaps on a comet or fragment of planet that exploded, and upon seeding the Earth began to evolve.
4. Yet another popular theory is that a god outside of the physical world created it for various reasons, willing life into being and then abandoning it to run its natural course.
5. The Elementalist, knowing consciousness to be the prima materia, laughs upon hearing all such nonsense.
6. There is no such thing as life; there is consciousness and the contents of consciousness.
7. The various fragments of consciousness incarnate into this world as the various creatures.
8. When these fragments of consciousness perceive each other’s physical forms through the sensory organs of their incarnations, it appears as if the physical world is the prima materia and that life has appeared on it.
9. The Elementalist knows this to be the Prime Illusion.
10. The physical world is a hallucination that is maintained by consciousness observing it.
11. The greater the number of fragments of consciousness that perceive any one part of the physical world, the more intensely real that part appears.
12. The apparent beginning of life on Earth, in proto-bacterial form, is illusory, as there is no such thing as time.
13. Life as a proto-bacteria, as with all other lives, is merely another set of perceptions that can be experienced by consciousness.
14. Life is precious because it is an incarnation of the divine.
15. All living things are incarnations of the divine experiencing the Great Fractal. Therefore, to cause suffering to life is to go against the will of the divine.
16. It’s not a crime to cause suffering to life if this should entertain the gods.
17. Few things appall the gods more than mindlessly causing suffering to life.
18. Each fragment of consciousness descends from a higher dimension into this physical world, and therein incarnates into a body. So begins each and every life.
19. Each of these bodies is fundamentally a vibration that resolves as different proportions of fire, air, water and earth, and from there to the infinite forms.
20. The fragment of consciousness ensouling each of these bodies is fundamentally a frequency that resolves as different proportions of clay, iron, silver and gold, and from there to the infinite forms.
21. The combination of vibrations of fire, air, water and earth and frequencies of clay, iron, silver and gold produce all the expressions of life on this planet.
22. Every form of life that could ever possibly exist exists within the Great Fractal, and always has, and always will.
*
This chapter is an excerpt from Elemental Elementalism, the foundational scripture of the new religion of the Age of Aquarius.
1. Perfect bliss is boring to the degree that it is blissful.
2. It was in order to alleviate the suffering of perfect boredom that the divine forgot some of itself, and, in doing so, dreamed up the Great Fractal.
3. The first thing that the divine dreamed up was a sine wave.
4. The second thing that the divine dreamed up was another sine wave, perpendicular to the first one.
5. The rest of the Great Fractal is also composed of sine waves, each running perpendicular to a previous one. This is true of all realms within the Great Fractal, whether physical, astral, mental or spiritual.
6. The divine dreamed up the Great Fractal faster than it could observe itself doing so. As such, the divine was left with the task of exploration.
7. What we call the physical world is one of the denser realms within the Great Fractal. Being dense, suffering is more intense here than in the subtler realms.
8. The real question is why our fragments of consciousness incarnated into this world and not one of the infinite others.
9. The only answer is that the divine willed it so, on the basis that incarnating into this world was appropriate for our frequencies of consciousness.
10. One reason to incarnate into a dense part of the Great Fractal is because the frequency of one’s consciousness is so low that the beings in higher realms and higher dimensions would suffer from one’s odious presence.
11. Another reason is because one’s true will is to burn away the impurities within one’s consciousness as rapidly as possible, and the lower the realm or dimension the more possibility there is for this.
12. Every part of the Great Fractal is filled with the consciousness of the divine at every moment.
13. Some parts of the Great Fractal experience a higher intensity of consciousness. This occurs when multiple fragments of consciousness experience the exact same vibration at the same time, which itself occurs when that part of the Great Fractal entertains the gods more than the others.
14. The Tard says to himself: the physical world was created by a force that is outside of us.
15. The Elementalist, understanding the First and Fourth Tenets, understands that the Great Fractal was dreamed up by divine consciousness.
16. The Elementalist understands that this physical world is merely a subset of the Great Fractal, and one in which perceptions are bound by certain laws.
17. This physical world is created in the moment from being observed by the fragments of consciousness that have incarnated here.
18. If the divine should tire of this world, there are infinite others. It’s simply a matter of willing to incarnate into one of them.
*
This chapter is an excerpt from Elemental Elementalism, the foundational scripture of the new religion of the Age of Aquarius.
