1. Normies, Tards and Hams are the principal opponents of the Elementalist.
2. A Normie doesn’t get it.
3. A Tard can’t get it.
4. A Ham won’t get it.
5. Most non-Elementalists are Normies.
6. The Normie is the common man who has not been introduced to Elementalism. He may not have heard of it, or he may have heard of it and not considered it important.
7. The Normie is not an enemy of the Elementalist, but rather someone who doesn’t understand the Four Tenets and their applications.
8. The Normie is the most likely of the three to convert to Elementalism.
9. Many people who are currently Normies are Elementalists to be. They are waiting to be exposed to the right information at the right time with the right energy, frequency and vibration.
10. Normies are found in almost every walk of life and in almost every position.
11. Tards are relatively few in number.
12. The Tard is someone who is not intelligent enough to get it.
13. The Tard is sometimes, but not always, an enemy of the Elementalist, and like the Normie they don’t understand the value of the Four Tenets and their applications.
14. The Tard is the least likely to convert to Elementalism, because they can’t understand it.
15. The difference between the Tard and the Normie is that the Tard is not intelligent enough to understand Elementalism no matter how it is presented.
16. Like the Normies, Hams are also very common.
17. The Ham is someone who refuses to get it.
18. The Ham refuses to get it because they are liars, wedded to lies. Lying is in their souls, and it finds expression in their every action.
19. The worst lies of the Ham are Judaism, Christianity, Islam and Baha’i.
20. All Hams are followers of the Principle of Evil.
21. The Ham is the primary enemy of the Elementalist.
22. All throughout human history, Hams have sought to destroy anyone who speaks spiritual truths. They will seek to destroy Elementalists.
23. The Ham is more likely to convert to Elementalism than the Tard, but less likely than the Normie.
24. Of the religions, only the Hams are wrong. All others are right.
25. Give a Ham an inch, he will take a mile. Give a Ham a mile, he will kill you and everyone you know.
*
This chapter is an excerpt from Elemental Elementalism, the foundational scripture of the new religion of the Age of Aquarius.
1. Understanding everyday life is a matter of understanding whose story we’re telling.
2. There are two fundamental narratives to what this life is about.
3. The first life narrative is that we are rising beasts who have evolved up out of the Earth.
4. The second life narrative is that we are fallen angels who have descended down out of the heavens.
5. The truth is that we are both rising beasts and fallen angels simultaneously. Both of these narratives are true, but sometimes one more than the other, depending on whose story we’re telling at the time.
6. To put too much value on the rising beast narrative is to occlude the divinity of humanity, leading to egotheism.
7. Egotheism bores the gods because it reminds them of the behaviour of children.
8. To put too much value on the fallen angel narrative is to occlude the lived reality inside the Great Fractal, leading to withdrawal.
9. Withdrawal bores the gods because it reminds them of the behaviour of suicides.
10. The imperative to entertain the gods demands that we balance the higher and lower selves, which both contribute to our experience of reality.
11. The higher and lower selves are balanced on the Great Masculine Axis.
12. The will to indulge the lower self is the same as the Undergoing Will.
13. The will to indulge the higher self is the same as the Overcoming Will.
14. Depending on which part of the Great Fractal one is in, the local environment will be conducive either to indulging the lower self or indulging the higher self.
15. If the local environment is conducive to indulging the lower self, but a person acts from the higher self, they will soon find themselves in an environment conducive to indulging the higher self, as per the Law of Attraction.
16. If the local environment is conducive to indulging the higher self, but a person acts from the lower self, they will soon find themselves in an environment conducive to indulging the lower self, as per the Law of Attraction.
17. Operating too much from the lower self causes the lived experience to become animal-like. The gods are bored by the predictability.
18. The animal experiences significance but he must suffer for it.
19. Operating too much from the higher self causes the lived experience to become ghost-like. The gods are bored by the unreality.
20. The ghost does not suffer but neither does he experience significance.
21. The gods created us to aspire to rise up the Great Masculine Axis, but to struggle to do so on account of our imperfect wills. They derive great amusement from the ensuing struggle.
22. The correct balance is struck by saying Yes to life as much as is possible while always keeping this Yeasaying subordinate to the First Tenet.
23. The Tenets are therefore a home base from which the Great Fractal can be explored in the service of entertaining the gods.
*
This chapter is an excerpt from Elemental Elementalism, the foundational scripture of the new religion of the Age of Aquarius.
A new moral fanaticism has swept the upper echelons of Western society in recent years. Called Wokeness, it’s cancelling wrongthinkers everywhere with the fervour of a jihadist driving a van through a crowd of Christmas shoppers. Although most people consider it an entirely new phenomenon, Wokeness is, in fact, another form of Abrahamic religion. This essay explains.
As first observed by Sri Dharma Pravartaka Acharya, Marxism is itself another form of Abrahamic religion. He defined it as an atheistic Abrahamism, in recognition of the fact that the Abrahamic cults are political religions and not spiritual ones. As a form of Abrahamism, Marxism shares with Judaism, Christianity, Islam and Baha’i a megalomanical desire to control the world and a psychopathic hatred of outsiders.
Wokeness developed out of Marxism in a similar manner to how Christianity and Islam developed out of Judaism. The only major difference between Wokeness and Marxism is that the latter was concerned with class questions, whereas the former has abandoned those for identity politics. In any case, Wokeness shares many characteristics with the Abrahamic religions.
Sri Dharma Pravartaka Acharya observed that the Abrahamic cults shared “A profound sense of religious exclusivity, creating two strictly delineated camps of ‘believers’ in opposition to everyone else.” The ‘with-us-or-against-us’ logic of Abrahamism has been adopted directly into Wokeness. The absurd outcomes of this can be seen in the purity spiral phenomenon.
One central belief of Wokeness is that those who follow it are considered saved, in the sense that they need not fear future judgment, whereas those who don’t follow it are considered damned. This judgment is absolute: anything a person may have achieved in their lives, any good works they may have done, are secondary to the question of whether they were Woke. In this manner, Wokeness builds a sense of community in the same way that the Abrahamic cults do: through hatred of outsiders.
Another observation of Sri Dharma Pravartaka Acharya is that the Abrahamic cults share “The belief that there is only the sole true faith, and that any other form of religious expression external to the ‘one true faith’ is necessarily wrong.” The Woke follow this belief, only with regard to political expressions.
They don’t care much what your religious beliefs are, but if you hold a contrary political opinion then you are the enemy. This is because the Woke have never questioned their own righteousness, not even once. So if you disagree with a Wokist, you’re simply wrong. There is no room for dialogue or discussion, because, to them, that would be to platform evil.
This attitude is similar to the Abrahamic attitude that no outside religious ideas can ever be entertained, lest it lead to a crisis of faith. The same way that Abrahamists seek to eradicate all trace of competing religious dogmas, the Woke seek to eradicate all trace of completing political dogmas. As their idol, Joseph Stalin, once said: “Ideas are more powerful than guns. We would not let our enemies have guns, why should we let them have ideas?”
Yet another observation is that the Abrahamic cults share “The acceptance of terrorism, violence, mob action, looting and aggressive missionary tactics to spread their religion.”
The Wokeness equivalent of crusading and jihading is cancel culture. The Woke don’t like to use mob terrorism to lynch people – that’s too working-class. The middle-class way to use mob terrorism is by doxxing wrongthinkers and trying to get them fired or deplatformed. The apogee of cancel culture is getting the mainstream media to run a hitpiece on someone.
Like the Abrahamists, the Woke derive a powerful sense of group bonding from destroying outsiders. The thought that those outsiders might take revenge thrills them because it suggests an escalation of conflict. Also like the Abrahamists, the Woke look forward to the one glorious day when they might destroy their enemies completely.
A further aspect of Wokeness shared by Abrahamism is “A common sense of being at a war to the death with the Dharmic (‘Pagan’) world that preceded Abrahamic ascendency.”
It has often been remarked that, for all their blustering about tyranny and oppression, the Woke don’t really care about the prohibition of spiritual sacraments such as cannabis and the psychedelics, and the countless people whose lives have been ruined by its enforcement. VJM Publishing has produced multiple books on the subject of cannabis law reform. But the Woke still consider us bad guys.
Some find this highly odd, but the explanation is simple. The Woke are politically religious, not spiritually religious, and as such they fear genuine spirituality, which they see as a competing ideology. Being soulless, the freedom to use spiritual sacraments such as cannabis and the psychedelics is not important to them. Moreover, people who do use such sacraments are usually anti-authoritarian, and therefore anti-Woke.
There are further similarities between Wokeness and the Abrahamic cults besides those observed by Sri Dharma Pravartaka Acharya.
Like Abrahamism, Wokeness is a conduit for sadistic and controlling urges, and attracts people with those urges. The sneering, arrogant superiority of the Woke is a mirror image of how Abrahamists behave towards non-believers. The Woke, just like the Abrahamist, want people punished for rejecting their religion. Also like the Abrahamic cults, Wokeness appeals to that base desire to punish.
Wokeness is also a universalist religion. A core part of Woke mentality is that it is a mindset for all times and all peoples. In the same way that individuals today can be judged as unworthy of respect for not being Woke, so too can individuals from centuries ago. Any person or any group of people is morally obliged to be Woke, even if they didn’t know about it.
The Woke believe that the Laws of Wokeness are written upon the hearts of men at birth.
Like Marxism and Christianity, Wokeness explicitly seeks to raise up the low and tear down the high. The difference is that instead of raising the proletariat above the bourgeoisie, or the meek above the cruel, the Woke raise the dark-skinned above the light-skinned, the homosexual above the heterosexual, the insane above the sane. The fact that this mentality harms the white working-class is seen as a bonus, as it punishes them for their rejection of Wokeness.
The most telling fact of all is that Wokeness is heavily promoted by Abrahamists. Jews, Christians and Muslims love nothing more than lecturing goyim/infidels/kaffirs about how concern for one’s own nation is the same kind of in-group favouritism that inspires genocides, and therefore evil. Wokeness can therein be understood as an ideology that serves the wider Abrahamic objective of destroying natural political organisation, and thereby competitors to Abrahamism.
Ultimately, Abrahamism and Wokeness share a great many characteristics because they are both forms of slave morality. Just like the Abrahamic cults, Wokeness is based on resentment for life, and saying No to it. As such, Wokeness can rightly be considered an evil that increases the human suffering in the world.
1. The Major Aspiration of every person is to entertain the gods.
2. The principal way to entertain the gods is through struggling in an attempt to achieve the meaning of one’s life.
3. The Minor Aspiration of every person is whatever they decide the meaning of their life is.
4. In principle, there are no restrictions to what a person might decide their Minor Aspiration is.
5. No matter how fervently they aspire to their Minor Aspiration, their struggles are always subordinate to the Major Aspiration. This is true whether or not they believe in Elementalism, and whether or not they have even heard of Elementalism.
6. Some decide that the meaning of their life is survival.
7. Those whose Minor Aspiration is survival operate on a similar level to prey animals. Their main concern is getting through to the next day.
8. Some decide that the meaning of their life is recreational.
9. Those whose Minor Aspiration is recreational operate on a similar level to children. Their main concern is lulz.
10. Some decide that the meaning of their life is physical.
11. Those whose Minor Aspiration is physical operate on a similar level to predatory animals. Their main concern is control.
12. Some decide that the meaning of their life is sexual.
13. Those whose Minor Aspiration is sexual operate on a similar level to bonobos. Their main concern is the next oxytocin hit.
14. Some decide that the meaning of their life is social.
15. Those whose Minor Aspiration is social operate on a similar level to wealthy people. Their main concern is the next dopamine hit.
16. Some decide that the meaning of their life is intellectual.
17. Those whose Minor Aspiration is intellectual operate on a similar level to the Seven Initiates. Their main concern is dispelling ignorance.
18. Some decide that the meaning of their life is spiritual.
19. Those whose Minor Aspiration is spiritual can operate on the same level as any other being, depending on the orientation of that spirituality and the degree to which a person successfully attains it.
20. It is important that a person knows what their Minor Aspiration is and where it might lie on the Great Masculine Axis.
21. Whatever a person decides the meaning of their life is, that meaning is subordinate to the Major Aspiration.
*
This chapter is an excerpt from Elemental Elementalism, the foundational scripture of the new religion of the Age of Aquarius.
